If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Children 'harmed' by vegan diets
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4282257.stm
Putting children on strict vegan diets is "unethical" and could harm their development, a US scientist has argued. Lindsay Allen, of the US Agricultural Research Service, attacked parents who insisted their children lived by the maxim "meat is murder". Animal source foods have some nutrients not found anywhere else, she told a Washington science conference. The Vegan Society dismissed the claims, saying its research showed vegans were often healthier than meat eaters. 'Development affected' Professor Allen said: "There have been sufficient studies clearly showing that when women avoid all animal foods, their babies are born small, they grow very slowly and they are developmentally retarded, possibly permanently." There's absolutely no question that it's unethical for parents to bring up their children as strict vegans Professor Lindsay Allen, US Agricultural Research Service "If you're talking about feeding young children, pregnant women and lactating women, I would go as far as to say it is unethical to withhold these foods [animal source foods] during that period of life." She was especially critical of parents who imposed a vegan lifestyle on their children, denying them milk, cheese, butter and meat. "There's absolutely no question that it's unethical for parents to bring up their children as strict vegans," she told the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Missing nutrients She said the damage to a child began while it was growing in the womb and continued once it had been born. Research she carried out among African schoolchildren suggests as little as two spoonfuls of meat each day is enough to provide nutrients such as vitamin B12, zinc and iron. The 544 children studied had been raised on diets chiefly consisting of starchy, low-nutrition corn and bean staples lacking these micronutrients. Over two years, some of the children were given 2oz supplements of meat each day, equivalent to about two spoonfuls of mince. Two other groups received either a cup of milk a day or an oil supplement containing the same amount of energy. The diet of a fourth group was left unaltered. HAVE YOUR SAY A wide-ranging mixed diet with exercise is essential for any child James, Cornwall, UK Send us your views The changes seen in the children given the meat, and to a lesser extent the milk or oil, were dramatic. These children grew more and performed better on problem-solving and intelligence tests than any of the other children at the end of the two years. They also became more active, talkative and playful at school. Adding either meat or milk to the diets also almost completely eliminated the very high rates of vitamin B12 deficiency previously seen in the children. No quick fixes Professor Allen stressed that although the study was conducted in a poor African community, its message was highly relevant to people in developed countries. She accepted that adults could avoid animal foods if they took the right supplements, but she said adding animal source food into the diet was a better way to tackle malnutrition worldwide than quick fixes with supplements in the form of pills. "Where feasible, it would be much better to do it through the diet than by giving pills," she said. "With pills it's very hard to be certain that the quantity of nutrition is right for everybody and it's hard to sustain." In Africa, good results had been obtained from giving people a dried meat on a stick snack which proved both nutritious and appealing. Professor Montague Demment, from the University of California at Davis, said more emphasis should be placed on animal source food to combat global malnutrition. Vegan defence However, the claims have been dismissed by the Vegan Society in the UK. In a statement, it said increasing numbers of people were opting for a plant-based diet. Kostana Azmi, the chief executive officer, said: "The vegan diet can provide you with more energy, nutrition, and is bursting with goodness." She said plant sources were sometimes a safer, and cheaper source of nutrients. For instance, animal sources of omega-3 oils, needed for the development of the brain and nervous system, were often contaminated with pollutants, such as mercury in fish. In addition, the vegan diet was often a healthier alternative. She said dairy and meat products were rich in saturated fat, while plant based diets were low in it. The society does recommend that vegans supplement their diet with vitamin B-12 pills. The US Agricultural Research Service is part of the US Department of Agriculture. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus15794 wrote:
Would be more interesting to know if children are harmed by low carb diets. My child is not low carbing, so this question is of theoretical nature. I think it depends on how you define low. 20g of carbs a day would likely stunt development. OTOH, 500 g of carbs a day will likely produce a fat child. 250g a day might be just right, depending on the kid. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus15794 wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:18:31 -0500, Roger Zoul wrote: Ignoramus15794 wrote: Would be more interesting to know if children are harmed by low carb diets. My child is not low carbing, so this question is of theoretical nature. I think it depends on how you define low. 20g of carbs a day would likely stunt development. OTOH, 500 g of carbs a day will likely produce a fat child. 250g a day might be just right, depending on the kid. I do not think that it is proper to refer to grams regardless of the weight of the child, but I agree that there is some best amount, depending on the child. Not many kids will need 500 g of carbs per day. It's not rocket science. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"none90810" wrote in message
oups.com... Kostana Azmi, the chief executive officer, said: "The vegan diet can provide you with more energy, nutrition, and is bursting with goodness." The society does recommend that vegans supplement their diet with vitamin B-12 pills. It made me laugh to read the two above sentences. Apparently there isn't enough "goodness" to avoid supplementing during pregnancy. Although, to say that developed countries can benefit, it doesn't seem that it'd be such an issue since anyone that visits a doctor will likely be given prenatal pills. Interesting research though, Mark |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 21 Feb 2005 22:54:43 GMT, Ignoramus15794
wrote: Would be more interesting to know if children are harmed by low carb diets. My child is not low carbing, so this question is of theoretical nature. I began LCing when my daughters were 2 and 3 years old. While I did not and have not pushed them towards a Low-Carb diet they decided on their own that they preferred meats, fruits and vegetables to make up the bulk of their diets (diet in the sense of 'what they eat' not 'deliberately restrictive eating plan') and self-limit grains and sugars. Recently they came home from a birthday party complaining that there hadn't been enough Good Things To Eat and they hadn't want to fill up on honey-popcorn and candy so could they have a nice plate of broccoli please? You can bet I quickly steamed them up some! On a typical day they would probably take in under 100g of carb - they are 10 and (almost) 9 years old now. The elder girl is at the 80th percentile for both height and weight (with very little extraneous fat - she's just a very active girl with plenty of muscle) while the younger is at the 75th percentile for height and the 50th for weight. They are involved with swimming and karate on a regular basis, and love to spend their own time in training for these sports as well as their regular training sessions. They are both extremely bright with reading and mathematics ages (as tested by the school) a good 4 years ahead of their chronological ages. For my kids, keeping them on a lower-carb plan seems not to have given them any problems so far. Aramanth |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On 21 Feb 2005 22:54:43 GMT, Ignoramus15794
wrote: Would be more interesting to know if children are harmed by low carb diets. My child is not low carbing, so this question is of theoretical nature. I began LCing when my daughters were 2 and 3 years old. While I did not and have not pushed them towards a Low-Carb diet they decided on their own that they preferred meats, fruits and vegetables to make up the bulk of their diets (diet in the sense of 'what they eat' not 'deliberately restrictive eating plan') and self-limit grains and sugars. Recently they came home from a birthday party complaining that there hadn't been enough Good Things To Eat and they hadn't want to fill up on honey-popcorn and candy so could they have a nice plate of broccoli please? You can bet I quickly steamed them up some! On a typical day they would probably take in under 100g of carb - they are 10 and (almost) 9 years old now. The elder girl is at the 80th percentile for both height and weight (with very little extraneous fat - she's just a very active girl with plenty of muscle) while the younger is at the 75th percentile for height and the 50th for weight. They are involved with swimming and karate on a regular basis, and love to spend their own time in training for these sports as well as their regular training sessions. They are both extremely bright with reading and mathematics ages (as tested by the school) a good 4 years ahead of their chronological ages. For my kids, keeping them on a lower-carb plan seems not to have given them any problems so far. Aramanth |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Roger Zoul wrote:
Ignoramus15794 wrote: Would be more interesting to know if children are harmed by low carb diets. My child is not low carbing, so this question is of theoretical nature. I think it depends on how you define low. 20g of carbs a day would likely stunt development. OTOH, 500 g of carbs a day will likely produce a fat child. 250g a day might be just right, depending on the kid. LittleBigMan (aka the grandkid) gets a maintenence type lowcarb diet, most days, somewhere between 100 and 150g, (but when he's with either set of grandparents it tends to go up another 50 grams or so-mostly junk food of course, I am a grandparent after all). He adores jerky, and cheese smothered anything, peanut butter, and bananas (his one really high carb fruit). He's not all that fond of wheat products (including sugar drenched cereals), and although corn chips are ok once in a while he likes plain popcorn much better. He actually likes spinach and broccoli and prefers them to peas and corn. His "bad food" passions are Diet Rite Tangerine soda and duck sauce drenched rice. Of course he loves chocolate, but he prefers the dark. His momma lowcarbed during pregnancy and lactation. He is in the 75th percentile for his age group (height, weight and mental/social development), according to WIC, and 'textbook perfect' according to his pediatrician, who seems moderately impressed with how healthy and bright he is, which makes me wonder what she normally deals with. -- revek This sentence no verb. This sentence short. This signature done. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
No problem Ig.
I feel (in the interests of honesty) that the odds are my kids would have been tall and smart even if they didn't LC. My 6'8" husband meant they got a lot of genes for 'tall' and we are both fairly intelligent. In fact, he's got a PhD in Tachyon Physics and currently works as a research scientist. So, they get a lot of encouragement at home to make the most of their brains which goes a long way towards their precocious reading and mathematical ability. Aramanth On 22 Feb 2005 01:16:13 GMT, Ignoramus15794 wrote: Thanks, Aramanth and revek. i On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:28:45 +1030, Aramanth Dawe wrote: On 21 Feb 2005 22:54:43 GMT, Ignoramus15794 wrote: Would be more interesting to know if children are harmed by low carb diets. My child is not low carbing, so this question is of theoretical nature. I began LCing when my daughters were 2 and 3 years old. While I did not and have not pushed them towards a Low-Carb diet they decided on their own that they preferred meats, fruits and vegetables to make up the bulk of their diets (diet in the sense of 'what they eat' not 'deliberately restrictive eating plan') and self-limit grains and sugars. Recently they came home from a birthday party complaining that there hadn't been enough Good Things To Eat and they hadn't want to fill up on honey-popcorn and candy so could they have a nice plate of broccoli please? You can bet I quickly steamed them up some! On a typical day they would probably take in under 100g of carb - they are 10 and (almost) 9 years old now. The elder girl is at the 80th percentile for both height and weight (with very little extraneous fat - she's just a very active girl with plenty of muscle) while the younger is at the 75th percentile for height and the 50th for weight. They are involved with swimming and karate on a regular basis, and love to spend their own time in training for these sports as well as their regular training sessions. They are both extremely bright with reading and mathematics ages (as tested by the school) a good 4 years ahead of their chronological ages. For my kids, keeping them on a lower-carb plan seems not to have given them any problems so far. Aramanth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Aramanth Dawe wrote:
No problem Ig. I feel (in the interests of honesty) that the odds are my kids would have been tall and smart even if they didn't LC. My 6'8" husband meant they got a lot of genes for 'tall' and we are both fairly intelligent. In fact, he's got a PhD in Tachyon Physics and currently works as a research scientist. So, they get a lot of encouragement at home to make the most of their brains which goes a long way towards their precocious reading and mathematical ability. Aramanth As another data point, my kidling comes from just the opposite background. 2 families of short folks, who have a wide IQ spread. I'm not naming names (to protect the guilty) but some of the stupids pulled could have damaged genetic matierial (or be evidence of same). -- revek You are in a maze of twisty little messages, all alike. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"revek" wrote in message
... He is in the 75th percentile for his age group (height, weight and mental/social development), according to WIC, and 'textbook perfect' according to his pediatrician, who seems moderately impressed with how healthy and bright he is, which makes me wonder what she normally deals with. Probably kids who drink a lot of soft drinks and juice and eat chips and sugary cereals. -- No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adherene to, not type of diet important for fat loss ( 4 popular diets compared ) | [email protected] | General Discussion | 5 | January 5th, 2005 06:57 PM |
Adherene to, not type of diet important for fat loss ( 4 popular diets compared ) | [email protected] | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 5 | January 5th, 2005 06:57 PM |
Oh, brother (I roll my eyes) | Eva Whitley | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 206 | May 23rd, 2004 04:45 PM |
'Put fat children on Atkins diet' | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 136 | April 8th, 2004 07:44 PM |
'Put fat children on Atkins diet' | Diarmid Logan | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 126 | April 8th, 2004 07:02 AM |