Why you should lose weight

"Ignoramus23502" wrote in message
...
In article , Mxsmanic wrote:
MH writes:

Not at all, but I don't think underaged teenagers
should be screwing around.

Why not?

I also would not want my son to screw around when he is underaged --
mainly due to the concern about collateral damage like stds and
pregnancies and such. But, I think, chances of him losing his
virginity before 18 are not that huge.

The original question directed to me though, was about my son screwing
around when he is 21, not an underaged teenager.

Actually the original question pertained to your son engaging in sexual
activities with a 16 yr old when he was 21.



Since when is waiting until a person is at least 18
and actually loves the person thinking sex is dirty
or disgusting?

Love and sex are two different things. It's important not to confuse
the two, and it's important to learn early in life that they are not the
same.

Not necessarily. You can live a happy life equating love and sex. But
who said that two young persons cannot love one another? Think Romeo
and Juliet.


I think perverts like you two are disgusting,
not meaningful sex.

Where do you see perversion?


everywhere...

i

Julianne writes:

Ah, see how we have traversed from having sex with 14 year olds to
acknowledging sexuality in persons younger than 18. That is a whole
different ball game.

Not really. Both 14 and 18 are post-puberty. People of both ages are
interested in sex, and often engage in it. I don't see any real
difference, apart from the 4-year difference in age itself.

For that matter, infants have a sexual identity.

Yes, but they don't take a post-pubertal interest in sex.

Not always. Depends on the state. In some states, their are two tiered
laws. If a teen has sex with another teen, it is not a crime. If an adult
has sex with a girl less than a certain age, it is considered to be a higher
level crime.

Why are there several tiers? And why sex with a _girl_, as opposed to
sex with a _minor_?

The reason for these laws is to protect young girls from being
coerced by adults who do not have thier best interests at heart.

Who protects older girls? And why don't boys require protection?

Not intrinsically but I can assure you that many young girls, who willingly
consent to sex, feel violated.

They've been conditioned all their lives to consider sex dirty, so that
is not surprising. But if they fear it that much, they should not
consent to it.

Also, there is great emotional harm from being branded
the school slut.

Then they should learn discretion as well.

Note that a girl who has sex with a boy her age is far more likely to
develop a reputation than a girl who has sex with a boy who is much
older, since the latter is more likely to exercise discretion than the
former.

To have family and friends reject you (or even revere you) because
you are sexually active is not a positive influence on a young lady.

Maybe, but this has nothing to do with competence or desire.

Again, there is a vast world of difference between treating people as
sexless neuters and condoning sex with 14 year olds.

No, they are practically the same thing. People who have passed through
puberty are not sexless neuters, and most people of age 14 have passed
through puberty, or are very nearly finished doing so.

Because it fed my ego - that's why!

No, I don't think so. It's hormones, not psychology. You didn't need
your ego fed at younger ages, why would that change at 13 or 14?

Without sounding trite, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Perhaps if you are ugly in your next incarnation, you'll learn just how
trite this statement really is.

Einstein was very ugly and many women find him very attractive.

It sounds like you've never looked at any photos of Einstein. He was
quite a good-looking guy. He wasn't always 85 years old with white
hair, you know.

No, adults do not wish to deny the hormonal influence on
behavior. Rather, responsible adults want to ensure that
it is not taken to far.

There is nothing dangerous about it. Sex is harmless if you take
precautions against STDs and pregnancy. And adults really don't have
much to say about it, anyway, as young people filled with hormones will
engage in sex, no matter what their elders think about it.

And it never occurs to you to gain experience elsewhere?

In some domains, experience would be of no use to me. I can't see any
utility in gaining experience with sex.

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 20:37:38 GMT, (Jayjay) wrote:

What's missing?

How about full grown breasts, full production hormones, and emotional
well being.

How about getting married instead of playing house with your BF for
six damn years?

Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.