Chung

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095439966.dE4KFD5Ibd8ViCjlNu5RGw@teranews:

Don Kirkman wrote:

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095341701.XLDSFQggs0dyjqK+1/pGYg@teranews:

Owen Lowe wrote:

In article ,
MU wrote:

snipped way too much for any reasonable person to take time to read

I see you value the (your) time to input such a ridiculously long response
equals, as always, your unrealistic expectation that there is a significant
return on your effort. That many will read and be convinced.

Such it is with the prideful, self absorbed ego.

Well,Mu, I found it rather interesting - guess I'm an unreasonable
person...

No, if you found it interesting, you probably have a tendency to "live to eat
rather than eat to live."

Many lead food-centric lives like yourself and Bob.

They also tend to have the greatest difficulty eating less and losing weight.

Yes, like me.

Does not surprise me.

Nor am I surprised that you continue to falsely attribute doctored
statements to those you oppose--out of "love" and "truth," I suppose.
What I wrote was

Yes, like me. I found it interesting, too. I love to eat (and run and
surf the internet and discuss meaningful issues and do a bit of yard
work and some of the household shopping); 150 lbs at 6'0". But I've
worked toward becoming unreasonable in discussing questionable
propositions.

Oh, typo. should be "I live to eat."

Now we can add your inane response: "Does not surprise me".
--
Don

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095439968.cCTrVg2SxpM608tlpkChfg@teranews:

Don Kirkman wrote:

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Bob (this one) wrote in article
:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Mirek Fidler wrote:

Average typical daily American intake probably exceeds 1 pound
of meat daily (many American folks will routinely eat a 12-16
oz of steak for just dinner). This would be more than 450
grams.

Note *probably* - it's a guess. And note all the assumptions pulled
out of thin air.

I've been wondering just how many "American folks will routinely eat a
12-16 oz of steak for just dinner." IME of several decades few families
have steak even once a week, and usually much less than 3/4 to one pound
steaks at that. Eight ounces, maybe. Those 12-16 ouncers are
supersized restaurant portions, and common folks don't eat out regularly
at steak houses.

Meat-eating obese folks do.

Andrew, you're apparently degenerating into a simpleminded transparent
troll. But I love to play with trolls. :-)
--
Don

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095439968.cCTrVg2SxpM608tlpkChfg@teranews:

Don Kirkman wrote:

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Bob (this one) wrote in article
:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Mirek Fidler wrote:

Average typical daily American intake probably exceeds 1 pound
of meat daily (many American folks will routinely eat a 12-16
oz of steak for just dinner). This would be more than 450
grams.

Note *probably* - it's a guess. And note all the assumptions pulled
out of thin air.

I've been wondering just how many "American folks will routinely eat a
12-16 oz of steak for just dinner." IME of several decades few families
have steak even once a week, and usually much less than 3/4 to one pound
steaks at that. Eight ounces, maybe. Those 12-16 ouncers are
supersized restaurant portions, and common folks don't eat out regularly
at steak houses.

Meat-eating obese folks do.

Andrew, you're apparently degenerating into a simpleminded transparent
troll. But I love to play with trolls. :-)
--
Don

Don Kirkman wrote:

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095439968.cCTrVg2SxpM608tlpkChfg@teranews:

Don Kirkman wrote:

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Bob (this one) wrote in article
:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Mirek Fidler wrote:

Average typical daily American intake probably exceeds 1 pound
of meat daily (many American folks will routinely eat a 12-16
oz of steak for just dinner). This would be more than 450
grams.

Note *probably* - it's a guess. And note all the assumptions pulled
out of thin air.

I've been wondering just how many "American folks will routinely eat a
12-16 oz of steak for just dinner." IME of several decades few families
have steak even once a week, and usually much less than 3/4 to one pound
steaks at that. Eight ounces, maybe. Those 12-16 ouncers are
supersized restaurant portions, and common folks don't eat out regularly
at steak houses.

Meat-eating obese folks do.

Andrew, you're apparently degenerating into a simpleminded transparent
troll.

Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.

But I love to play with trolls. :-)

Your self-worship does not surprise me either.



--
Don


You remain in my prayers, dear Don whom I love.

You remain in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love.

Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867

Don Kirkman wrote:

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095439966.dE4KFD5Ibd8ViCjlNu5RGw@teranews:

Don Kirkman wrote:

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095341701.XLDSFQggs0dyjqK+1/pGYg@teranews:

Owen Lowe wrote:

In article ,
MU wrote:

snipped way too much for any reasonable person to take time to read

I see you value the (your) time to input such a ridiculously long response
equals, as always, your unrealistic expectation that there is a significant
return on your effort. That many will read and be convinced.

Such it is with the prideful, self absorbed ego.

Well,Mu, I found it rather interesting - guess I'm an unreasonable
person...

No, if you found it interesting, you probably have a tendency to "live to eat
rather than eat to live."

Many lead food-centric lives like yourself and Bob.

They also tend to have the greatest difficulty eating less and losing weight.

Yes, like me.

Does not surprise me.

Nor am I surprised

I know.

You remain in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love.

Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867

In article ,
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot.

"Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to
recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to
remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it
leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember
that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind
enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use
on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating
and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...?

Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you
know how many pounds you ate?

In article ,
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot.

"Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to
recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to
remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it
leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember
that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind
enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use
on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating
and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...?

Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you
know how many pounds you ate?

In article ,
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot.

"Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to
recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to
remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it
leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember
that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind
enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use
on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating
and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...?

Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you
know how many pounds you ate?

Owen Lowe wrote:

In article ,
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot.

"Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to
recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to
remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it
leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember
that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind
enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use
on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating
and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...?


Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you
know how many pounds you ate?

And what about cutting meat into several pieces... division
everywhere... LOL

Bob

Owen Lowe wrote:

In article ,
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot.

"Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to
recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to
remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it
leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember
that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind
enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use
on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating
and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...?


Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you
know how many pounds you ate?

And what about cutting meat into several pieces... division
everywhere... LOL

Bob