OT - Top/bottom posting

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:09:15 -0500, "Chris Taylor Jr"
wrote:

You have BEEN boring since the first tiem I read your first post.

so i am suddenly interesting now , huh?
you sir,, are simply a pharkun idjut,, a class1 clown.

YES google does store all of this. go enlighten yourself.

heh, heh,, I just luurrrrrrrrrrrrve this !

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=al...=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
8&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search

what did you expect me to find ???
yesterdays news? big fsckn deal!
hey,, dude,, methinks you have an arsefull of Micro****e
bugs.
U R a Gates puppet, R U not?
typical fsckn "NEXT" puncher.
NFI at all,,,cluelessssss!

I have a good mind to crosspost this post to a couple of IT
groups that would REALLY give your bull**** comments some
sound thumping.
however,, this (asdl-c) is a 'quiet spot',, I would not
spoil it for the likes of wannabe XSpurts as yourself.

buuuuut i *_have_* invoked some wonderful IT magic trick
(secret - for L337 peeps only - doan try this at home folks)
so that your blustering buffoonery is enshrined forever,,an'
I have no problem nailing my nick to your arse,,,,
at all at all EG

now you go and find these posts of mine in your go go goggle
machine....
post the message ID ('s) eh,, there's a good little MS
puppet.
=============================================
extract:
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 03:15:42 GMT
Lines: 67
From: MërëMåLË
Newsgroups: alt.support.diet.low-carb
Subject: How do you judge taste?

to use your analogy of "how cold" I can point you in the
direction of the very answer you have given yourself.
there is no such tangible thing as cold, quantifiable or
other wise.
"cold" is merely the absence of heat. heat is quantifiable.
"cold"/"warm"/"hot are discussed daily all over the planet
yet cannot be 'judged' by any scale as they are personal
expression of a condition.
============================================
extract:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:58:29 -0600
From: MërëMåLË
Newsgroups: alt.support.diet.low-carb
Subject: alcohol mixed drink?
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:54:19 +0930

Kerosene

1 X 10oz/250ml tall glass
1 X good shake Angrostrua Bitters
http://www.angostura.com/recsoup.shtml
3 X Slake ICE spoons
Fill - dont shake/stir - with Soda
============================================

ZiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnG.
methinks that one is over the fence for six !

bye arseHole

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
*note to newbies*
if this clown posts any low carb living pearls of wisdom I
strongly suggest you consider their credibility in the light
of the ravings displayed in IT related posts.
ie. completely twisted viewpoint that will not accept blunt
reason. far from an open attitude as one can get.
cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MërëMåLË
- -

*.·´¨¨))
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))*
*((¸¸.·´ ..·´
((¸¸.·´*

How Much?
http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/npc/anzfa_npc/
How Does That Work?
http://tgos.org/newbie/rules.html
http://livinginternet.com/u/ua.htm
http://www.forteinc.com/agent/faq.php
http://www.urbandictionary.com
http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
Need A Friend?
http://www-ai.ijs.si/eliza-cgi-bin/eliza_script

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:06:40 -0500, "Chris Taylor Jr"
wrote:

Then I have no interest in continuing this conversation with you.

This is truly the first intelligent thing I have seen from you and I
agree totally.

It is clear you are not going to take the sensible path on this. it is clear
you have no intention of staying anywhere near the topic.

go away troll

Chris Taylor
http://www.nerys.com/


Convenient. its usually how trolls like you opearte.

Wow. Not only can't you spell, you still have no idea what the word
"troll" means on Usenet.

Again ... surprise, surprise.

Dawn'

NO thanks. I have no need to. YOU go find mine where you CLAIM I said things
I did not say.

YOU made the claim YOU put up or shut up.

I am waiting.

Chris Taylor
http://www.nerys.com/



now you go and find these posts of mine in your go go goggle
machine....
post the message ID ('s) eh,, there's a good little MS
puppet.

Well that is a start.

Sadly you are still delusional on the issue of fact here.

Owell. a little bit of progress at a time is better than none.

Chris Taylor
http://www.nerys.com/



Then I have no interest in continuing this conversation with you.

This is truly the first intelligent thing I have seen from you and I
agree totally.

Chris Taylor Jr wrote:

Incorrect. Please show me a single newspaper that lists the question TWICE
and then lists the answer.

What are you going on about? Neither context-free top-posting nor
context-full bottom posting has ever involving quoting twice. I
have no idea why you made that up and started using it is a strawman.

Before the first top-post ever happened, the UseNet rules were
maintained in the newsgroup news.annouce.newusers. At the time no
newsreader software allowed anyone to unsubscribe to that group.
The rules at that time insisted on trimming and they were silent on
the issue of top posting because no one had ever done a top post.
The archives are on groups.google.com under the "net" hierarchy
that predates all modern groups. Go ahead and point to even one
top post in those old groups. But eventually newsreaders came out
that did not enforce a subscription to that newsgroup and it has
not been maintained for years. Without ever being revoked, it
became unenforcable.

The RFCs have always been the official rules of the Internet.
Denying that they are doesn't stop them from being the rules. But
denying that they are does show that they are also unenforcible.
The RFC on UseNet posting standards requires both trimming and
context based bottom posting. And the RFC is unenforcible.