Question for Mu

On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:41:30 -0600, revek wrote:

Stunkard may have done so but this is not my source.

1# For the last time, POST YOUR SOURCE or shut up already.

I don't play the "research" game with ppl that can't tell the difference
between good and bad research. See Luna on this. Google is your friend.

Now, get to work on my FAQ, revek.

2# I don't do your faq, I just link to it.

It's dishonest of you to link to an out of date FAQ and you could easily
add the additional data. But noooooooooooo, you only want to deal in half
truths and such.

Now, get to work on my FAQ, revek. Or shut up already.

MU wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:41:30 -0600, revek wrote:

Stunkard may have done so but this is not my source.

1# For the last time, POST YOUR SOURCE or shut up already.

I don't play the "research" game with ppl that can't tell the
difference between good and bad research. See Luna on this. Google is
your friend.

I think you spend too much time looking in the mirror and projecting your
faults onto other people.

Now, get to work on my FAQ, revek.

2# I don't do your faq, I just link to it.

It's dishonest of you to link to an out of date FAQ and you could
easily add the additional data. But noooooooooooo, you only want to
deal in half truths and such.

Keep your day job, you're not that funny as a comedian.


Now, get to work on my FAQ, revek. Or shut up already.

Bite me.


--�
revek
Don't ever think you know what's right for the other guy.
He might start thinking he knows what's right for you.

It's dishonest of you to link to an out of date FAQ and you could
easily add the additional data. But noooooooooooo, you only want to
deal in half truths and such.

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:58:40 -0600, revek wrote:

Keep your day job, you're not that funny as a comedian.

I was being truthful not comedic.

Now, get to work on my FAQ, revek. Or shut up already.

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:58:40 -0600, revek wrote:

Bite me.

Snappy comeback. Don't you have work to do? Data, updates, please.

I don't play the "research" game with ppl that can't tell the
difference between good and bad research. See Luna on this. Google is
your friend.

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:58:40 -0600, revek wrote:

I think you spend too much time looking in the mirror and projecting your
faults onto other people.

I don't think, I know you are clueless,

" I don't play the "research" game with ppl that can't tell the
difference between good and bad research. See Luna on this. Google is
your friend.

And what of those, like Andrew, who can tell the difference but is unable
to bring himself to admit his failure to support his claims on the diet?

wrote:

" I don't play the "research" game with ppl that can't tell the
difference between good and bad research. See Luna on this. Google is
your friend.

And what of those, like Andrew, who can tell the difference but is unable
to bring himself to admit his failure to support his claims on the diet?


It remains my choice to write truthfully.

Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9

"on't play the "research" game with ppl that can't tell the
erence between good and bad research. See Luna on this. Google is
friend.

t of those, like Andrew, who can tell the difference but is unable
g himself to admit his failure to support his claims on the diet?

It remains my choice to write truthfully."

And as we continue our work jointly, you can also say you write so as to
make the diet valid and complete. Your first intresting observation was
intresting, and true, but not complete as to best and effective
application. Let us do pray God that we not fall into the sins of
ommission in the pursuit of truth.

"on't play the "research" game with ppl that can't tell the
erence between good and bad research. See Luna on this. Google is
friend.

t of those, like Andrew, who can tell the difference but is unable
g himself to admit his failure to support his claims on the diet?

It remains my choice to write truthfully."

And as we continue our work jointly, you can also say you write so as to
make the diet valid and complete. Your first intresting observation was
intresting, and true, but not complete as to best and effective
application. Let us do pray God that we not fall into the sins of
ommission in the pursuit of truth.

"MU" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:15:26 -0500, Bob Mauri wrote:


How's your understanding of multivariate
statistics or any of the following:

The design of experiments
Sampling and observational studies
Summarizing data
Presenting data
Probability
The normal distribution
Estimation techniques
Significance tests
Comparing the means of small samples
Regression and correlation
Methods based on rank order
The analysis of cross-tabulations
Choosing the proper statistical method
Clinical measurement
Mortality statistics and population structures
Multifactorial methods and possibilities
Determination of sample size(s) - appropriate or not?

Sure, you may be able to read the results of statistics but *how*
those
statistics were obtained, and their accuracy, is always going to be
out
of
your reach.


Heck, it's just math, and simple math at that. This easily could be
covered in high school, or -- at most -- the first year of college.
It's
about algebraic levels, not calculus or differential equations. You
might
need a class in matrix math. But it's very easy.

You took regression stat in HS? I'm impressed.

Linear regression techniques are a lot easier for most folks to understand
and calculate than things like differential equations. I was taught those
techniques in high school, before I took calculus. We didn't delve into
them in detail, but we were exposed to them as part of basic probability and
statistics (they are the basis for how a lot of scientific research is
validated).

Later, in college, I took a lower division statistics class in which we
explored those concepts in much more detail. The things you refer do not
qualify as "rocket science" math, and most folks can understand the concepts
even if they don't know how to perform the calculations.

--
GG
http://www.WeightWare.com
Your Weight and Health Diary

"MU" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:15:26 -0500, Bob Mauri wrote:


How's your understanding of multivariate
statistics or any of the following:

The design of experiments
Sampling and observational studies
Summarizing data
Presenting data
Probability
The normal distribution
Estimation techniques
Significance tests
Comparing the means of small samples
Regression and correlation
Methods based on rank order
The analysis of cross-tabulations
Choosing the proper statistical method
Clinical measurement
Mortality statistics and population structures
Multifactorial methods and possibilities
Determination of sample size(s) - appropriate or not?

Sure, you may be able to read the results of statistics but *how*
those
statistics were obtained, and their accuracy, is always going to be
out
of
your reach.


Heck, it's just math, and simple math at that. This easily could be
covered in high school, or -- at most -- the first year of college.
It's
about algebraic levels, not calculus or differential equations. You
might
need a class in matrix math. But it's very easy.

You took regression stat in HS? I'm impressed.

Linear regression techniques are a lot easier for most folks to understand
and calculate than things like differential equations. I was taught those
techniques in high school, before I took calculus. We didn't delve into
them in detail, but we were exposed to them as part of basic probability and
statistics (they are the basis for how a lot of scientific research is
validated).

Later, in college, I took a lower division statistics class in which we
explored those concepts in much more detail. The things you refer do not
qualify as "rocket science" math, and most folks can understand the concepts
even if they don't know how to perform the calculations.

--
GG
http://www.WeightWare.com
Your Weight and Health Diary