A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Fat Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old November 10th, 2003, 07:00 AM
Black Jacque Shellacque
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)

JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Black Jacque Shellacque" wrote in message
news:4Yjrb.7564$jy.6471@clgrps13...


JC Der Koenig wrote:



why don't you go back to sucking your boyfriends dick and leave the diet
advice to the competent.




....hark....an asshole speaketh......




So speak up, asshole.


Don't have to, you already did.







--
Getting married for sex is like buying a 747 for the free peanuts
--Jeff Foxworthy




  #62  
Old November 10th, 2003, 08:07 AM
Robert Schuh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)

revek wrote:

"Robert Schuh" wrote in message
...
JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Vegetarian" wrote in message
...
In article , JC

Der Koenig
wrote:
Look at your BMI. At 5'6" and 190, you are over 30, which is
categorized as obese.



And if he is at 12% bodyfat? Still obese?

Idiot.



I highly doubt that having this pile of useless, worthless

muscles is
doing anything good for his health. Having a BMI of 32 is bad.

Being
fat at BMI 32 is horrible, being muscular at BMI 32 is not that

great
either.

Some dumbo bodybuilders think that by growing muscles, they are

doing
themselves a favor. One needs to only look at their IQ to

realize that
it is not the case and that they are not benefitting.

John.

I've been laboring under the misconception that any correlation

between
muscularity and intelligence is strictly coincidental. Would you

care to
cite any studies that back up your gay little hypothesis?


JC,
You were doing well until you threw in your "gay" comment.

Homophobia has no
place in this argument.


But pedophilia apparently does.


Learn the difference between humor and bigotry.



Stick to the facts. I thought that most people stopped
thinking calling someone "gay" was an insult after the 5th grade or

so.

Please. Come back and moralize at others when you can live up to your
own standards.


I do asshole. I have forgotten more about these topics than 99.99999% of
you clowns will ever know.



"John, when you butch up and learn a thing or two about these topics
come back, but for now, just keep fondling your neighbor's 5 year old
son."

Message-ID:

revek

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 11/3/2003


How about posting your name to your cowardly commentary??


--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche
"The meek shall inherit nothing" - Zappa


  #63  
Old November 10th, 2003, 08:08 AM
Robert Schuh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)

JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Robert Schuh" wrote in message
...
JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Vegetarian" wrote in message
...
In article , JC Der

Koenig
wrote:
Look at your BMI. At 5'6" and 190, you are over 30, which is
categorized as obese.



And if he is at 12% bodyfat? Still obese?

Idiot.



I highly doubt that having this pile of useless, worthless muscles is
doing anything good for his health. Having a BMI of 32 is bad. Being
fat at BMI 32 is horrible, being muscular at BMI 32 is not that great
either.

Some dumbo bodybuilders think that by growing muscles, they are doing
themselves a favor. One needs to only look at their IQ to realize that
it is not the case and that they are not benefitting.

John.

I've been laboring under the misconception that any correlation between
muscularity and intelligence is strictly coincidental. Would you care to
cite any studies that back up your gay little hypothesis?


JC,
You were doing well until you threw in your "gay" comment. Homophobia has

no
place in this argument. Stick to the facts. I thought that most people

stopped
thinking calling someone "gay" was an insult after the 5th grade or so.



Gay as in happy. Try to think outside the box you've built for yourself.


Nice try asshole, but you know you were being a bigoted little ****.


--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche
"The meek shall inherit nothing" - Zappa


  #64  
Old November 10th, 2003, 08:09 AM
Robert Schuh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)

roger wrote:

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 14:49:12 -0700, Robert Schuh
wrote:


JC,
You were doing well until you threw in your "gay" comment. Homophobia has no
place in this argument. Stick to the facts.


Interesting comment from Schuh who said this to me in a thread:

Go back to getting your kiddy porn collection
on alphabetical order.


I guess throwing in a pedophilia comment is appropriate. Pot, kettle
black.

Roger


Listen you anonymous little ****, there is a HUGE difference between humor and
bigotry. It is not my fault that you are a moron. Go smack your parents for your
poor genes.


--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche
"The meek shall inherit nothing" - Zappa


  #65  
Old November 10th, 2003, 08:11 AM
Robert Schuh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)

roger wrote:

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 14:46:30 -0700, Robert Schuh
wrote:

but for now, just keep fondling your neighbor's 5 year
old son.


Schuh seems to have a preoccupation with pedophilic fantasies. I
repeat my hope that he never raised any children.

Roger


Once again, **** you and your kids. How about addressing the facts here
correctly? That is the MAIN issue here. All of you anonymous clowns are
a waste of time anyway.


--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche
"The meek shall inherit nothing" - Zappa


  #66  
Old November 10th, 2003, 08:14 AM
David Cohen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)


"Robert Schuh" wrote

Learn the difference between humor and bigotry.


Q: What do you call an African-American neurosurgeon?

A: ******.

Hmmm....could be both

David


  #67  
Old November 10th, 2003, 08:24 AM
revek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)


"Robert Schuh" wrote in message
...

Homophobia has no
place in this argument.


But pedophilia apparently does.


Learn the difference between humor and bigotry.


You have some special code only you can read that signals when you're
being cute? You've posted like drivel before, or so another poster
says. Pulling the "it was only a joke" routine in the middle of an
argument might get you off once. Once.


Stick to the facts. I thought that most people stopped
thinking calling someone "gay" was an insult after the 5th grade

or
so.

Please. Come back and moralize at others when you can live up to

your
own standards.


I do asshole.


Cute. You're projecting again.

I have forgotten more about these topics than 99.99999% of
you clowns will ever know.


Or so you claim. I have more sense than to take your word alone for
it.

"John, when you butch up and learn a thing or two about these

topics
come back, but for now, just keep fondling your neighbor's 5 year

old
son."

Message-ID:

revek


How about posting your name to your cowardly commentary??


Why?

revek


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 11/4/2003


  #68  
Old November 10th, 2003, 11:50 AM
JC Der Koenig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)


"Robert Schuh" wrote in message
...
JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Robert Schuh" wrote in message
...
JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Vegetarian" wrote in message
...
In article , JC Der

Koenig
wrote:
Look at your BMI. At 5'6" and 190, you are over 30, which is
categorized as obese.



And if he is at 12% bodyfat? Still obese?

Idiot.



I highly doubt that having this pile of useless, worthless muscles

is
doing anything good for his health. Having a BMI of 32 is bad.

Being
fat at BMI 32 is horrible, being muscular at BMI 32 is not that

great
either.

Some dumbo bodybuilders think that by growing muscles, they are

doing
themselves a favor. One needs to only look at their IQ to realize

that
it is not the case and that they are not benefitting.

John.

I've been laboring under the misconception that any correlation

between
muscularity and intelligence is strictly coincidental. Would you

care to
cite any studies that back up your gay little hypothesis?

JC,
You were doing well until you threw in your "gay" comment. Homophobia

has
no
place in this argument. Stick to the facts. I thought that most people

stopped
thinking calling someone "gay" was an insult after the 5th grade or

so.



Gay as in happy. Try to think outside the box you've built for yourself.


Nice try asshole, but you know you were being a bigoted little ****.


So what about this obsession of yours with the topics of homosexuality and
pedophilia? Is there something that happened to you as a youngster?


  #69  
Old November 10th, 2003, 04:20 PM
Christine O
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)

If you think promoting Atkins makes you competent, you are wrong. Mad
hatter is correct. You MUST exercise, and you MUST have a proper diet. It
is that simple. People fail at these fad diets because they are just that,
fads.


Words of wisdom :-)

Akins maintains a Cult like following, so I am guessing my words will fall
on deaf ears.


That's true of any weight loss plan, really. We went to Weight
Watchers and lost a combined 70lbs. We reached and exceeded our 10%
goal and have kept the weight off for over a year. Some WW members
were pretty fanatical about keeping track of everything, but I don't
think it's a fault of the program. I guess it is easy to get obsessed
with what you eat. The group leader was a hoot and it was nice to get
out and chat with other people trying to lose weight. We don't go
anymore because we don't need the support so much. WW was really
eye-opening and it was mostly about changing behaviour - like finding
something to do if you're bored instead of eating, or find another way
to deal with a personal problem rather than drowning it in a bag of
chips. There are no bad foods on WW :-) It really teaches restraint
and moderation.

OTOH, a friend of ours keeps touting Atkins as the greatest thing
since apple pie. He was always putting down WW and said it was a waste
of money. He rallies on and on about ketosis, but, the fact of the
matter is, two years later, we met our weight loss goals and he hasn't
lost a pound. I think WW was money well spent. I'm not bashing Atkins,
but I think too many people fall into the rah! rah! rah! trap and then
are not able to follow or commit to their weight-loss plan at all. If
Atkins works for you, great :-) Different things work for different
folks.

Best,
Christine
  #70  
Old November 10th, 2003, 05:23 PM
Luna
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)

In article ,
(Christine O) wrote:

If you think promoting Atkins makes you competent, you are wrong. Mad
hatter is correct. You MUST exercise, and you MUST have a proper diet. It
is that simple. People fail at these fad diets because they are just that,
fads.


Words of wisdom :-)

Akins maintains a Cult like following, so I am guessing my words will fall
on deaf ears.


That's true of any weight loss plan, really. We went to Weight
Watchers and lost a combined 70lbs. We reached and exceeded our 10%
goal and have kept the weight off for over a year. Some WW members
were pretty fanatical about keeping track of everything, but I don't
think it's a fault of the program. I guess it is easy to get obsessed
with what you eat. The group leader was a hoot and it was nice to get
out and chat with other people trying to lose weight. We don't go
anymore because we don't need the support so much. WW was really
eye-opening and it was mostly about changing behaviour - like finding
something to do if you're bored instead of eating, or find another way
to deal with a personal problem rather than drowning it in a bag of
chips. There are no bad foods on WW :-) It really teaches restraint
and moderation.

OTOH, a friend of ours keeps touting Atkins as the greatest thing
since apple pie. He was always putting down WW and said it was a waste
of money. He rallies on and on about ketosis, but, the fact of the
matter is, two years later, we met our weight loss goals and he hasn't
lost a pound. I think WW was money well spent. I'm not bashing Atkins,
but I think too many people fall into the rah! rah! rah! trap and then
are not able to follow or commit to their weight-loss plan at all. If
Atkins works for you, great :-) Different things work for different
folks.

Best,
Christine


It's the same with anything though. People get all excited about
exercising, go out and buy home gyms, and a few months later the gyms are
sitting in a corner with laundry draped over them. Or someone gets all
excited about getting married, and a year into it they realize that
relationships take work, it's not fun all the time. It's not the specific
diet plan that one follows, it's the attitude.

--
-Michelle Levin (Luna)
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
http://www.mindspring.com/~designbyluna


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins: The Scarlett A's.. Eat Carbs Stay Alive. Steve Randy Shilts Bayt General Discussion 7 June 25th, 2004 09:24 PM
AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins: The Scarlett A's.. Eat Carbs Stay Alive. Steve Randy Shilts Bayt Low Carbohydrate Diets 10 June 25th, 2004 09:24 PM
You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof. marengo Low Carbohydrate Diets 173 April 17th, 2004 11:26 PM
Dr. ATKINS IS A QUACK Irv Finkleman Low Carbohydrate Diets 5 March 31st, 2004 12:37 PM
Atkins = ? (should i start this again?) Steven C \(Doktersteve\) Low Carbohydrate Diets 98 December 8th, 2003 04:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.