A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 18th, 2004, 02:44 PM
Diarmid Logan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99995003

Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet

12:21 18 May 04

NewScientist.com news service

The claimed benefits of the controversial low-carbohydrate Atkins diet
have been reaffirmed in two new studies, one of which is the longest
study to date.

"I think it's good news for Atkins dieters," says Linda Stern, who led
the first study of 132 obese patients at the Veterans Affairs Medical
Center in Philadelphia, US.

The diet was devised by the late US doctor Robert Atkins. To lose
weight, devotees avoid carbohydrates and consume more protein and fat
instead.

Both new studies found that subjects on the Atkins diet shed
significant amounts of weight without harmful effects on blood fats
and sugars. But the studies have failed to silence critics of the
diet, who want the US government to investigate alleged adverse
effects.

Stern's year-long study (Annals of Internal Medicine, vol 140, p778)
was twice the length of any previous study. Half the patients followed
the Atkins regime, limiting daily carbohydrate intake to just 30
grams. The rest tried losing weight through a conventional low-fat
diet much richer in carbohydrates.

By the end, both groups had lost about the same amount of weight,
between five and eight kilograms for the Atkins group and three and
eight kilos for the low fat group. But the Atkins dieters lost almost
all their weight in the first six months, then remained at a steady
weight.

Stern says that this pattern of rapid weight loss matches that seen in
an earlier but shorter study of Atkins dieters, by Gary Foster's team
at the University of Pennsylvania in May 2003. "I'm impressed that
they didn't gain it all back," says Stern.

Compared with the low-fat group, Atkins dieters also had lower levels
of triglycerides, potentially harmful blood sugars which can trigger
heart disease. Concentrations of beneficial high density cholesterols
(HDLs) also held up better in the Atkins group. And these favourable
changes remained till the end of the study, suggesting that there
might be lasting benefits.

"But what we really need is a study showing whether people on the
low-carbohydrate diet for years have different odds of heart attacks,
strokes and diabetes," she says.

A second, six-month study on 120 overweight patients at Duke
University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, echoes the first,
with low-carbohydrate dieters shedding an average of 12 kilos, twice
that lost by those on a low-fat regime (Annals of Internal Medicine,
vol 140, p769). And the pattern of blood fats and sugars mirrored that
in Stern's study.

"Over six months, the diet appears to be relatively safe, but we need
to study the safety for longer durations," says Will Yancy, head of
the Duke team.

But critics highlight some negative findings from the Duke study.
"This new evidence confirms that levels of 'bad' cholesterol worsen in
a substantial number of low-carbohydrate dieters," said Neal Barnard
of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a vegan lobby
group in Washington DC.

"And the supposedly dramatic benefits of the diet do not hold up over
the long term," said Barnard, referring to the end of weight loss
after six months in the Stern study.

Although broadly supportive of the Atkins regime, Yancy warns that the
diet could pose risks including the higher "bad" cholesterol, bone
loss and kidney stones. Because of this, he discourages first-time
dieters from using the regime.

Andy Coghlan

****************************************

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3722221.stm

Scientists endorse Atkins diet

Following a low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet is a more effective
way to lose weight than following a low fat diet, say US researchers.

Two studies published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine found
weight loss was greatest when people followed an Atkins-style diet.

Cholesterol levels also seemed to improve more on a low-carb diet
compared to a low-fat diet.

However, the research was funded by the Robert C Atkins Foundation.

And critics say there are still serious doubts about the long-term
effect on health of adopting such diets.

In the first study, researchers at Duke University Medical Center in
Durham, North Carolina, assigned 120 obese volunteers to either a
low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet or a low-fat, low-cholesterol,
low-calorie diet.

After six months, the people on the Atkins-style diet had lost an
average of 26 pounds, compared to an average of 14 pounds in the
conventional low-fat diet group.

The low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet also had a good effect on fat
levels.

The Atkins dieters lost more body fat, lowered their triglyceride
levels and raised their "good" HDL cholesterol levels more than the
low-fat dieters.

In the second study, researchers at the Veterans Affairs Medical
Center in Philadelphia followed 132 obese adults who were randomised
to either low-carbohydrate or low-fat diet groups.

Again, after six months the people following the low-carbohydrate diet
lost the most weight and had improved fat levels.

However, at 12 months both groups had lost similar amounts of weight.

The low fat group had continued to lose weight from six to 12 months
while the average weight in the low-carbohydrate group had remained
steady after six months.

Lead author of the Philadelphia study Dr Linda Stern said: "I think a
low-carbohydrate diet is a good choice because much of our overeating
has to do with consumption of too many carbohydrates."

But she said more research was needed to see if a low-carbohydrate
diet remained safe and effective over the longer term.

In an accompanying editorial, Dr Walter Willett, from the Harvard
School of Public Health in the US, said: "We can no longer dismiss
very-low-carbohydrate diets."

But he added that such diets should include healthy sources of protein
and fat and incorporate regular exercise.

"Patients should focus on finding ways to eat that they can maintain
indefinitely rather than seeking diets that promote rapid weight
loss," he said.

Dr David Haslam, chairman of the National Obesity Forum, said: "There
is no doubt that if low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets are followed
properly you will lose weight.

"What's always been questioned is the long term efficacy of such diets
and in the short term, with weight loss, there are certain risks in
certain patients - like patients with renal problems."

"There's still no long term data about the efficacy and you can't
stick on that type of diet for long because it's unpalatable," he
said.

Dr Haslam called for more research spanning five to six years rather
than months.

He said the best diet was still a healthy, balanced diet cutting out
excessive fat.

"One thing the Atkins isn't is balanced. It's not what the body
expects and that's why we don't know the long term changes," he said.

Dietzmina Govindji, of the British Dietetic Association, also warned
people against thinking Atkins, or other similar diets, were the best
way to lose weight.

She said: "Do not be sucked in by the cabbage soup diet and other fad
diets.

"The thing to remember about all these quick-fix diets is they do help
you lose weight very, very quickly but often you will put it back on
very, very quickly and they often miss out on whole food groups, so
you are not getting the full range of vitamins and minerals you need."
  #2  
Old May 18th, 2004, 02:49 PM
Evelyn Ruut
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet

"Diarmid Logan" wrote in message
om...
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99995003



Compared with the low-fat group, Atkins dieters also had lower levels
of triglycerides, potentially harmful blood sugars which can trigger
heart disease. Concentrations of beneficial high density cholesterols
(HDLs) also held up better in the Atkins group. And these favourable
changes remained till the end of the study, suggesting that there
might be lasting benefits.


Andy Coghlan




Andy I saw this on the news today (and last night), where they covered this
subject.

Thanks for posting this here.

It reflects my own experience as well.

--
Regards,
Evelyn

(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox")


  #3  
Old May 18th, 2004, 02:53 PM
Crafting Mom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet

Can't comment on the article, but one would think that people who are
educated to become writers of articles would know what a "regime" is and
what a "regimen" is.

Diarmid Logan wrote:

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99995003

Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet

12:21 18 May 04

NewScientist.com news service

The claimed benefits of the controversial low-carbohydrate Atkins diet
have been reaffirmed in two new studies, one of which is the longest
study to date.

"I think it's good news for Atkins dieters," says Linda Stern, who led
the first study of 132 obese patients at the Veterans Affairs Medical
Center in Philadelphia, US.

The diet was devised by the late US doctor Robert Atkins. To lose
weight, devotees avoid carbohydrates and consume more protein and fat
instead.

Both new studies found that subjects on the Atkins diet shed
significant amounts of weight without harmful effects on blood fats
and sugars. But the studies have failed to silence critics of the
diet, who want the US government to investigate alleged adverse
effects.

Stern's year-long study (Annals of Internal Medicine, vol 140, p778)
was twice the length of any previous study. Half the patients followed
the Atkins regime, limiting daily carbohydrate intake to just 30
grams. The rest tried losing weight through a conventional low-fat
diet much richer in carbohydrates.

By the end, both groups had lost about the same amount of weight,
between five and eight kilograms for the Atkins group and three and
eight kilos for the low fat group. But the Atkins dieters lost almost
all their weight in the first six months, then remained at a steady
weight.

Stern says that this pattern of rapid weight loss matches that seen in
an earlier but shorter study of Atkins dieters, by Gary Foster's team
at the University of Pennsylvania in May 2003. "I'm impressed that
they didn't gain it all back," says Stern.

Compared with the low-fat group, Atkins dieters also had lower levels
of triglycerides, potentially harmful blood sugars which can trigger
heart disease. Concentrations of beneficial high density cholesterols
(HDLs) also held up better in the Atkins group. And these favourable
changes remained till the end of the study, suggesting that there
might be lasting benefits.

"But what we really need is a study showing whether people on the
low-carbohydrate diet for years have different odds of heart attacks,
strokes and diabetes," she says.

A second, six-month study on 120 overweight patients at Duke
University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, echoes the first,
with low-carbohydrate dieters shedding an average of 12 kilos, twice
that lost by those on a low-fat regime (Annals of Internal Medicine,
vol 140, p769). And the pattern of blood fats and sugars mirrored that
in Stern's study.

"Over six months, the diet appears to be relatively safe, but we need
to study the safety for longer durations," says Will Yancy, head of
the Duke team.

But critics highlight some negative findings from the Duke study.
"This new evidence confirms that levels of 'bad' cholesterol worsen in
a substantial number of low-carbohydrate dieters," said Neal Barnard
of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a vegan lobby
group in Washington DC.

"And the supposedly dramatic benefits of the diet do not hold up over
the long term," said Barnard, referring to the end of weight loss
after six months in the Stern study.

Although broadly supportive of the Atkins regime, Yancy warns that the
diet could pose risks including the higher "bad" cholesterol, bone
loss and kidney stones. Because of this, he discourages first-time
dieters from using the regime.

Andy Coghlan

****************************************

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3722221.stm

Scientists endorse Atkins diet

Following a low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet is a more effective
way to lose weight than following a low fat diet, say US researchers.

Two studies published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine found
weight loss was greatest when people followed an Atkins-style diet.

Cholesterol levels also seemed to improve more on a low-carb diet
compared to a low-fat diet.

However, the research was funded by the Robert C Atkins Foundation.

And critics say there are still serious doubts about the long-term
effect on health of adopting such diets.

In the first study, researchers at Duke University Medical Center in
Durham, North Carolina, assigned 120 obese volunteers to either a
low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet or a low-fat, low-cholesterol,
low-calorie diet.

After six months, the people on the Atkins-style diet had lost an
average of 26 pounds, compared to an average of 14 pounds in the
conventional low-fat diet group.

The low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet also had a good effect on fat
levels.

The Atkins dieters lost more body fat, lowered their triglyceride
levels and raised their "good" HDL cholesterol levels more than the
low-fat dieters.

In the second study, researchers at the Veterans Affairs Medical
Center in Philadelphia followed 132 obese adults who were randomised
to either low-carbohydrate or low-fat diet groups.

Again, after six months the people following the low-carbohydrate diet
lost the most weight and had improved fat levels.

However, at 12 months both groups had lost similar amounts of weight.

The low fat group had continued to lose weight from six to 12 months
while the average weight in the low-carbohydrate group had remained
steady after six months.

Lead author of the Philadelphia study Dr Linda Stern said: "I think a
low-carbohydrate diet is a good choice because much of our overeating
has to do with consumption of too many carbohydrates."

But she said more research was needed to see if a low-carbohydrate
diet remained safe and effective over the longer term.

In an accompanying editorial, Dr Walter Willett, from the Harvard
School of Public Health in the US, said: "We can no longer dismiss
very-low-carbohydrate diets."

But he added that such diets should include healthy sources of protein
and fat and incorporate regular exercise.

"Patients should focus on finding ways to eat that they can maintain
indefinitely rather than seeking diets that promote rapid weight
loss," he said.

Dr David Haslam, chairman of the National Obesity Forum, said: "There
is no doubt that if low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets are followed
properly you will lose weight.

"What's always been questioned is the long term efficacy of such diets
and in the short term, with weight loss, there are certain risks in
certain patients - like patients with renal problems."

"There's still no long term data about the efficacy and you can't
stick on that type of diet for long because it's unpalatable," he
said.

Dr Haslam called for more research spanning five to six years rather
than months.

He said the best diet was still a healthy, balanced diet cutting out
excessive fat.

"One thing the Atkins isn't is balanced. It's not what the body
expects and that's why we don't know the long term changes," he said.

Dietzmina Govindji, of the British Dietetic Association, also warned
people against thinking Atkins, or other similar diets, were the best
way to lose weight.

She said: "Do not be sucked in by the cabbage soup diet and other fad
diets.

"The thing to remember about all these quick-fix diets is they do help
you lose weight very, very quickly but often you will put it back on
very, very quickly and they often miss out on whole food groups, so
you are not getting the full range of vitamins and minerals you need."


--
The post you just read, unless otherwise noted, is strictly my opinion
and experience. Please interpret accordingly.
  #6  
Old May 18th, 2004, 04:40 PM
Mirek Fidler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet


"Diarmid Logan" píse v diskusním príspevku
om...
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99995003


was twice the length of any previous study. Half the patients followed
the Atkins regime, limiting daily carbohydrate intake to just 30
grams.


Ooops. Limiting carbs intake to 30 grams is NOT Atkins regime.

These are induction levels and you are not supposed to be so low for
more then couple of weeks, most prefferable 14 days only. Certainly not
for one year.

Compared with the low-fat group, Atkins dieters also had lower levels
of triglycerides, potentially harmful blood sugars which can trigger
heart disease. Concentrations of beneficial high density cholesterols
(HDLs) also held up better in the Atkins group. And these favourable
changes remained till the end of the study, suggesting that there
might be lasting benefits.


One might ask what lipid results the study would gave if Atkins (or more
generall LC approach) was really followed, raising maintainance carbs
levels to 80-120g with vegetable and fruit sources.

But critics highlight some negative findings from the Duke study.
"This new evidence confirms that levels of 'bad' cholesterol worsen in
a substantial number of low-carbohydrate dieters," said Neal Barnard
of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a vegan lobby
group in Washington DC.


Yeah, sure. Chicken meat is unhealthy because there is no vitamin C in
it.

Mirek


  #7  
Old May 18th, 2004, 04:47 PM
gman99
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet

(Diarmid Logan) wrote:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99995003

Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet

A year long study with 132 people does NOT a true trial make...six months
is nothing....
  #8  
Old May 18th, 2004, 04:52 PM
Evelyn Ruut
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet

"Bob in CT" wrote in message
news
Did you increase your carbohydrate intake, as required by Atkins, during
this period? Did you find your critical carbohydrate level for losing?
What most people do is keep eating at 20-30 grams of carbs per day, which
is not what Atkins advocates. Did you exercise? Also, calories are
always important, regardless of what "diet" you follow.

--
Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply




Very good points, which also reflect my own experience. I lost a certain
amount of weight then stalled, and I wasn't too meticulous about watching
those things (above) and I was lazy about exercise too. I think some sort
of a modified version will evolve that may be best for me. Maybe South
Beach or something..... and the exercise of course.
--
Regards,
Evelyn

(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox")


  #10  
Old May 18th, 2004, 05:10 PM
Jackie Patti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Longest scientific study yet backs Atkins diet

gman99 wrote:

A year long study with 132 people does NOT a true trial make...six months
is nothing....


Feel free to fund a larger long-term study.

--
As you accelerate your food, it takes exponentially more and more energy
to increase its velocity, until you hit a limit at C. This energy has
to come from somewhere; in this case, from the food's nutritional value.
Thus, the faster the food is, the worse it gets.
-- Mark Hughes, comprehending the taste of fast food

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dr. ATKINS IS A QUACK Irv Finkleman Low Carbohydrate Diets 5 March 31st, 2004 12:37 PM
Uncovering the Atkins diet secret Diarmid Logan General Discussion 135 February 14th, 2004 05:56 PM
Atkins diet may reduce seizures in children with epilepsy Diarmid Logan General Discussion 23 December 14th, 2003 12:39 PM
erm, is this article TRUE to any extent? Steven C. \(Doktersteve\) Low Carbohydrate Diets 11 November 29th, 2003 08:43 PM
Now Harvard study backs up Atkins diet Diarmid Logan General Discussion 84 November 17th, 2003 12:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.