LC Anniversary!

Lybbe wrote:

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:51:05 GMT, (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote:


sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

Good grief - did she hit a nerve? You not losing? So what??? Why do
you have to rain on somebody else's parade.

it has nothing to do with losing weight, and she obviously doesn't need
me to rain on her parade: she's doing it herself by letting people she
doesn't like live rent-free in her head. freedom from excess bodyweight
doesn't mean much if you're still a slave to your useless emotional
baggage, which can be just as heavy as fat - if not heavier.

Lybbe wrote:

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:51:05 GMT, (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote:


sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

Good grief - did she hit a nerve? You not losing? So what??? Why do
you have to rain on somebody else's parade.

it has nothing to do with losing weight, and she obviously doesn't need
me to rain on her parade: she's doing it herself by letting people she
doesn't like live rent-free in her head. freedom from excess bodyweight
doesn't mean much if you're still a slave to your useless emotional
baggage, which can be just as heavy as fat - if not heavier.

Dear Queenie - Hope you enjoy your close association with JC in my killfile.
Bye!

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
.. .
Lybbe wrote:

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:51:05 GMT, (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote:


sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

Good grief - did she hit a nerve? You not losing? So what??? Why do
you have to rain on somebody else's parade.

it has nothing to do with losing weight, and she obviously doesn't need
me to rain on her parade: she's doing it herself by letting people she
doesn't like live rent-free in her head. freedom from excess bodyweight
doesn't mean much if you're still a slave to your useless emotional
baggage, which can be just as heavy as fat - if not heavier.

Dear Queenie - Hope you enjoy your close association with JC in my killfile.
Bye!

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
.. .
Lybbe wrote:

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:51:05 GMT, (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote:


sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

Good grief - did she hit a nerve? You not losing? So what??? Why do
you have to rain on somebody else's parade.

it has nothing to do with losing weight, and she obviously doesn't need
me to rain on her parade: she's doing it herself by letting people she
doesn't like live rent-free in her head. freedom from excess bodyweight
doesn't mean much if you're still a slave to your useless emotional
baggage, which can be just as heavy as fat - if not heavier.

"Ada Ma" wrote in message
...
"Marcusj" wrote:
"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote:
sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a
specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

This sounds incredibly inconsistent coming from somebody who regularly
supports J.C. and his awful comments.

i've never supported his nastiness. i support his attempts to try to
steer people towards self-sufficiency.

i do understand that most people are unable to make the distinction.


Your constant support of his comments is only making the nasty comments
come
more often.

I do understand that you might be unable to make that distinction.


I don't suppose you're suggesting that the Queen has control over what JC
writes?


I don't suppose that you can't see that supporting somebody who does nothing
but make nasty and hurtful comments only brings on more nasty and hurtful
comments.

Jean,
Congratulations on your loss, that is great!
It's extremely humorous that only those who promote the discouraging and
nasty remarks in this newsgroup took offense in the slightest to what you
said.

Mark.


"Jean Staffen" wrote in message
...
Dear Queenie - Hope you enjoy your close association with JC in my
killfile.
Bye!

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
.. .
Lybbe wrote:

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:51:05 GMT, (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote:


sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

Good grief - did she hit a nerve? You not losing? So what??? Why do
you have to rain on somebody else's parade.

it has nothing to do with losing weight, and she obviously doesn't need
me to rain on her parade: she's doing it herself by letting people she
doesn't like live rent-free in her head. freedom from excess bodyweight
doesn't mean much if you're still a slave to your useless emotional
baggage, which can be just as heavy as fat - if not heavier.

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
.. .
Marcusj wrote:

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
.. .

sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a
specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

This sounds incredibly inconsistent coming from somebody who regularly
supports J.C. and his awful comments.

i've never supported his nastiness. i support his attempts to try to
steer people towards self-sufficiency.

i do understand that most people are unable to make the distinction.


Your constant support of his comments is only making the nasty comments
come
more often.

I do understand that you might be unable to make that distinction.

you don't know how to read, do you?

You don't have a life outside this newsgroup, do you?

Thanks, Mark. I was just feeling frisky because of my anniversary and
having resolved (finally) an on-going and very painful problem in my
personal life.

I sincerely appreciate your support and just know I was being silly and
meant NOTHING serious in my flippant remarks.

Love to all us losers!

Jean


"Marcusj" wrote in message
...
Jean,
Congratulations on your loss, that is great!
It's extremely humorous that only those who promote the discouraging and
nasty remarks in this newsgroup took offense in the slightest to what you
said.

Mark.


"Jean Staffen" wrote in message
...
Dear Queenie - Hope you enjoy your close association with JC in my
killfile.
Bye!

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
.. .
Lybbe wrote:

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:51:05 GMT, (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote:


sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a
specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

Good grief - did she hit a nerve? You not losing? So what??? Why do
you have to rain on somebody else's parade.

it has nothing to do with losing weight, and she obviously doesn't need
me to rain on her parade: she's doing it herself by letting people she
doesn't like live rent-free in her head. freedom from excess
bodyweight
doesn't mean much if you're still a slave to your useless emotional
baggage, which can be just as heavy as fat - if not heavier.

Ada Ma wrote:

"Marcusj" wrote:
"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote:
sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a
specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

This sounds incredibly inconsistent coming from somebody who regularly
supports J.C. and his awful comments.

i've never supported his nastiness. i support his attempts to try to
steer people towards self-sufficiency.

i do understand that most people are unable to make the distinction.


Your constant support of his comments is only making the nasty comments
come
more often.

I do understand that you might be unable to make that distinction.


I don't suppose you're suggesting that the Queen has control over what JC
writes?

he doesn't know what he's suggesting. he doesn't even seem to realize
that i rarely reply to JC, let alone that i don't agree with 75% of what
he posts.

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
. ..
Ada Ma wrote:

"Marcusj" wrote:
"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote:
sniping is sniping, whether it's at the "anonymous void" or a
specific
person. her need to make such a petty comment detracts from her
success. there's more to being "successful" than losing weight.

This sounds incredibly inconsistent coming from somebody who
regularly
supports J.C. and his awful comments.

i've never supported his nastiness. i support his attempts to try to
steer people towards self-sufficiency.

i do understand that most people are unable to make the distinction.


Your constant support of his comments is only making the nasty comments
come
more often.

I do understand that you might be unable to make that distinction.


I don't suppose you're suggesting that the Queen has control over what JC
writes?

he doesn't know what he's suggesting. he doesn't even seem to realize
that i rarely reply to JC, let alone that i don't agree with 75% of what
he posts.

Shocking.