GOD's omer... GOD's approach... One amount for all adults.

Bob (this one) wrote:
wrote:

Chung wrote:
"However, the results are as follows:

Sustained weight loss for everyone over a period of more than 5 years
for more than 625,550 participants. No deaths from either malnutrition
or starvation during the study."

Where was the study done and how long ago and what research protocol was
used and how was it funded?

There was no study, never happened, no protocol, no funding.
These are the biblical Jews wandering in the desert. Chung
says they ate an omer of manna daily and that's the basis of
this quackery. He dismisses the actual details as offered in
the bible about what else they ate and how that omer was
collected and consumed. There can be no reported results for
a purported event for which there is no detailed record. No
study.

And he steadfastly insists that an omer is a measure of
weight with not one single source corroborating it, but
many, many reputable sources delineating/demonstrating that
it was a unit of volume, fractionally corresponding to other
well-established volume units.

Typically, he asserts synthetic "facts" not in evidence in
the bible to counter the rational issues brought to his
delusional ravings. He has no knowledge about deaths or
births or anything else beyond what was written, much less
any causes or effects. He has no knowledge about weight gain
or loss for those wanderers. He has no information that
everyone else doesn't have. He tries to bolster his
intellectual house of cards with such invented "facts" and
merely demonstrates how crippled his thinking and his ideas
actually are.

Your bearing false witness against me is forgiven as far as I am
concerned.

May GOD continue to heal your heart, dear neighbor Bob whom I love.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet.


Why is it a sin to eat rabbit?

On 21 Aug 2006 13:05:27 -0700, "Nechesh"
wrote:


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet.


Why is it a sin to eat rabbit?

It's not, unless you're another rabbit.

On sins, thou art on usenet. The two greatest commandments
a

Thou shall not respond to Chung.

Thou shall not cross-post to diabetes groups.

Roger Lapin

....because thge sun rises on your right,unless you are looking the other
way, then it is above you with chocolate ice cream.......
"Nechesh" wrote in message
ups.com...

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet.


Why is it a sin to eat rabbit?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Bob (this one) wrote:
wrote:

Chung wrote:
"However, the results are as follows:
Sustained weight loss for everyone over a period of more than 5 years
for more than 625,550 participants. No deaths from either malnutrition
or starvation during the study."

Where was the study done and how long ago and what research protocol was
used and how was it funded?

There was no study, never happened, no protocol, no funding.
These are the biblical Jews wandering in the desert. Chung
says they ate an omer of manna daily and that's the basis of
this quackery. He dismisses the actual details as offered in
the bible about what else they ate and how that omer was
collected and consumed. There can be no reported results for
a purported event for which there is no detailed record. No
study.

And he steadfastly insists that an omer is a measure of
weight with not one single source corroborating it, but
many, many reputable sources delineating/demonstrating that
it was a unit of volume, fractionally corresponding to other
well-established volume units.

Typically, he asserts synthetic "facts" not in evidence in
the bible to counter the rational issues brought to his
delusional ravings. He has no knowledge about deaths or
births or anything else beyond what was written, much less
any causes or effects. He has no knowledge about weight gain
or loss for those wanderers. He has no information that
everyone else doesn't have. He tries to bolster his
intellectual house of cards with such invented "facts" and
merely demonstrates how crippled his thinking and his ideas
actually are.

Your bearing false witness against me is forgiven as far as I am
concerned.

You grow more hilariously/sadly deluded with each passing
day, Andrew. But I note no elaboration of that "false witness."
Typically, you offer no countering information, merely
innuendo in an unsupported accusation.

I can't imagine anything less important or meaningful than
your "forgiveness."

It is a splendidly smarmy thing you do when you say
"Sustained weight loss for everyone over a period of more
than 5 years for more than 625,550 participants. No deaths
from either malnutrition or starvation during the study"
with not the most microscopic scintilla of substantiation.
You slip-slide out of it by claiming that god has told you
not to tell us yet. Literally incredible.

The mark of a non-scientist. The mark of a non-truthful
person. The mark of a quack, charlatan, fraud. The mark of a
hyper-religious, self-besotted, terrified little boy.

Pastorio

Bob (this one) wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Bob (this one) wrote:
wrote:

Chung wrote:
"However, the results are as follows:
Sustained weight loss for everyone over a period of more than 5 years
for more than 625,550 participants. No deaths from either malnutrition
or starvation during the study."

Where was the study done and how long ago and what research protocol was
used and how was it funded?

There was no study, never happened, no protocol, no funding.
These are the biblical Jews wandering in the desert. Chung
says they ate an omer of manna daily and that's the basis of
this quackery. He dismisses the actual details as offered in
the bible about what else they ate and how that omer was
collected and consumed. There can be no reported results for
a purported event for which there is no detailed record. No
study.

And he steadfastly insists that an omer is a measure of
weight with not one single source corroborating it, but
many, many reputable sources delineating/demonstrating that
it was a unit of volume, fractionally corresponding to other
well-established volume units.

Typically, he asserts synthetic "facts" not in evidence in
the bible to counter the rational issues brought to his
delusional ravings. He has no knowledge about deaths or
births or anything else beyond what was written, much less
any causes or effects. He has no knowledge about weight gain
or loss for those wanderers. He has no information that
everyone else doesn't have. He tries to bolster his
intellectual house of cards with such invented "facts" and
merely demonstrates how crippled his thinking and his ideas
actually are.

Your bearing false witness against me is forgiven as far as I am
concerned.

You grow more hilariously/sadly deluded with each passing
day, Andrew. But I note no elaboration of that "false witness."
Typically, you offer no countering information, merely
innuendo in an unsupported accusation.

I can't imagine anything less important or meaningful than
your "forgiveness."

It is a splendidly smarmy thing you do when you say
"Sustained weight loss for everyone over a period of more
than 5 years for more than 625,550 participants. No deaths
from either malnutrition or starvation during the study"
with not the most microscopic scintilla of substantiation.
You slip-slide out of it by claiming that god has told you
not to tell us yet. Literally incredible.

The mark of a non-scientist. The mark of a non-truthful
person. The mark of a quack, charlatan, fraud. The mark of a
hyper-religious, self-besotted, terrified little boy.

Your continuing to bear false witness against me is forgiven as far as
I am concerned.

May GOD continue to heal your heart, dear neighbor Bob whom I love
unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...7b57d0fbf89ed?

Important message for the very elect:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...25eb1d5cf468a?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

wrote:

Chung wrote:
"However, the results are as follows:
Sustained weight loss for everyone over a period of more than 5 years
for more than 625,550 participants. No deaths from either malnutrition
or starvation during the study."

Where was the study done and how long ago and what research protocol was
used and how was it funded?

http://med4um.com/about5182.html

For a truly zany exchange about the diet and the 625,500, go
he
http://www.femalelife.sk/about1920-0...ave-lives.html

For Chung's explanations - go about 1/2 way down...
http://www.usenethealth.com/archive/topic.php/t-784901.html

Pastorio

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Bob (this one) wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Bob (this one) wrote:
wrote:

Chung wrote:
"However, the results are as follows:
Sustained weight loss for everyone over a period of more than 5 years
for more than 625,550 participants. No deaths from either malnutrition
or starvation during the study."

Where was the study done and how long ago and what research protocol was
used and how was it funded?

There was no study, never happened, no protocol, no funding.
These are the biblical Jews wandering in the desert. Chung
says they ate an omer of manna daily and that's the basis of
this quackery. He dismisses the actual details as offered in
the bible about what else they ate and how that omer was
collected and consumed. There can be no reported results for
a purported event for which there is no detailed record. No
study.

And he steadfastly insists that an omer is a measure of
weight with not one single source corroborating it, but
many, many reputable sources delineating/demonstrating that
it was a unit of volume, fractionally corresponding to other
well-established volume units.

Typically, he asserts synthetic "facts" not in evidence in
the bible to counter the rational issues brought to his
delusional ravings. He has no knowledge about deaths or
births or anything else beyond what was written, much less
any causes or effects. He has no knowledge about weight gain
or loss for those wanderers. He has no information that
everyone else doesn't have. He tries to bolster his
intellectual house of cards with such invented "facts" and
merely demonstrates how crippled his thinking and his ideas
actually are.
Your bearing false witness against me is forgiven as far as I am
concerned.
You grow more hilariously/sadly deluded with each passing
day, Andrew. But I note no elaboration of that "false witness."
Typically, you offer no countering information, merely
innuendo in an unsupported accusation.

I can't imagine anything less important or meaningful than
your "forgiveness."

It is a splendidly smarmy thing you do when you say
"Sustained weight loss for everyone over a period of more
than 5 years for more than 625,550 participants. No deaths
from either malnutrition or starvation during the study"
with not the most microscopic scintilla of substantiation.
You slip-slide out of it by claiming that god has told you
not to tell us yet. Literally incredible.

The mark of a non-scientist. The mark of a non-truthful
person. The mark of a quack, charlatan, fraud. The mark of a
hyper-religious, self-besotted, terrified little boy.

Your continuing to bear false witness against me is forgiven as far as
I am concerned.

Thank you for making this post available again to serve as a
further reminder to many people by fully quoting it, Andrew.
Your abiding fraudulence is just made more incarnate that way.

You are a most generous person.

Just kidding.

Pastorio