If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:46:17 GMT, Chris Braun
wrote: On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:14:13 -0400, "Beverly" wrote: "jmk" wrote in message ... Speaking of pedometer challenge, let's plan on doing one next week. Everyone who is interested, please plan to wear your pedometer next Monday. :-) -- jmk in NC Count me in! I'll get to use my new one with all the fancy settings - if I can figure it out G Beverly - who is going for the standard 10,000 steps per day since I spend most of my day seated at a computer. I have a pedometer question. I got a freebie pedometer with some Citrucel I bought, and wore it today for the first time. I had an uncommonly sedentary day. We couldn't walk at lunchtime because it was pouring rain, and it this is one of my gym days off. And I wasn't very active at work -- just a bit of walking around the hallways, to and from the cafeteria at lunchtime (it's a ways -- big building -- but still no big deal), walking to and from my car in the parking lot (also a ways), etc. Well, right now my pedometer reads 5296 steps, which seems like rather a lot for an inactive day. But I can also switch it to display miles walked -- though of course it doesn't know my stride length, so I'm not sure how it's computing this -- and it shows .985 miles. This seems entirely plausible given my inactivity. But I thought that in general a mile was on the order of 2000 steps. So I don't understand whether one of these numbers is wrong, or how the pedometer is computing the mileage from the step count, or what's going on. Any thoughts? I'm hesitant to make much use of this if what it does isn't making sense to me. Thanks! Chris 262/139/ (145-150) Doesn't sound right to me. For me, 10,000 steps is something over 4 miles, so by this reckoning you'd have to have walked at least 2 miles to get your reading. Do you have a way of checking it along a stretch of road or something whose distance is already known to you? You could also mentally count the paces for a few hundred, and then see if your pedometer has registered the same number as you've counted. If it's really out, I'd try a different one. Janice |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:46:17 GMT, Chris Braun
wrote: On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:14:13 -0400, "Beverly" wrote: "jmk" wrote in message ... Speaking of pedometer challenge, let's plan on doing one next week. Everyone who is interested, please plan to wear your pedometer next Monday. :-) -- jmk in NC Count me in! I'll get to use my new one with all the fancy settings - if I can figure it out G Beverly - who is going for the standard 10,000 steps per day since I spend most of my day seated at a computer. I have a pedometer question. I got a freebie pedometer with some Citrucel I bought, and wore it today for the first time. I had an uncommonly sedentary day. We couldn't walk at lunchtime because it was pouring rain, and it this is one of my gym days off. And I wasn't very active at work -- just a bit of walking around the hallways, to and from the cafeteria at lunchtime (it's a ways -- big building -- but still no big deal), walking to and from my car in the parking lot (also a ways), etc. Well, right now my pedometer reads 5296 steps, which seems like rather a lot for an inactive day. But I can also switch it to display miles walked -- though of course it doesn't know my stride length, so I'm not sure how it's computing this -- and it shows .985 miles. This seems entirely plausible given my inactivity. But I thought that in general a mile was on the order of 2000 steps. So I don't understand whether one of these numbers is wrong, or how the pedometer is computing the mileage from the step count, or what's going on. Any thoughts? I'm hesitant to make much use of this if what it does isn't making sense to me. Thanks! Chris 262/139/ (145-150) Doesn't sound right to me. For me, 10,000 steps is something over 4 miles, so by this reckoning you'd have to have walked at least 2 miles to get your reading. Do you have a way of checking it along a stretch of road or something whose distance is already known to you? You could also mentally count the paces for a few hundred, and then see if your pedometer has registered the same number as you've counted. If it's really out, I'd try a different one. Janice |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Braun wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:14:13 -0400, "Beverly" wrote: "jmk" wrote in message ... Speaking of pedometer challenge, let's plan on doing one next week. Everyone who is interested, please plan to wear your pedometer next Monday. :-) -- jmk in NC Count me in! I'll get to use my new one with all the fancy settings - if I can figure it out G Beverly - who is going for the standard 10,000 steps per day since I spend most of my day seated at a computer. I have a pedometer question. I got a freebie pedometer with some Citrucel I bought, and wore it today for the first time. I had an uncommonly sedentary day. We couldn't walk at lunchtime because it was pouring rain, and it this is one of my gym days off. And I wasn't very active at work -- just a bit of walking around the hallways, to and from the cafeteria at lunchtime (it's a ways -- big building -- but still no big deal), walking to and from my car in the parking lot (also a ways), etc. Well, right now my pedometer reads 5296 steps, which seems like rather a lot for an inactive day. But I can also switch it to display miles walked -- though of course it doesn't know my stride length, so I'm not sure how it's computing this -- and it shows .985 miles. This seems entirely plausible given my inactivity. But I thought that in general a mile was on the order of 2000 steps. So I don't understand whether one of these numbers is wrong, or how the pedometer is computing the mileage from the step count, or what's going on. Any thoughts? I'm hesitant to make much use of this if what it does isn't making sense to me. My free McDonald's pedometer seems to increase the count like crazy whenever I sway back and forth. For example, I can get 1000 steps by folding laundry (standing in one place.) Lowering my pants to go to the bathroom is worth 200 steps. :-) That said, a fairly sedentary day where you walk around the parking lot, back and forth a ways to the cafeteria and then maybe stop at the grocery store could be about 6000 steps. The lowest I've seen on a very sedentary day for me was around 3500 steps and that's with NO commute and lunch 20 feet down the hall. Dally |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Braun wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:14:13 -0400, "Beverly" wrote: "jmk" wrote in message ... Speaking of pedometer challenge, let's plan on doing one next week. Everyone who is interested, please plan to wear your pedometer next Monday. :-) -- jmk in NC Count me in! I'll get to use my new one with all the fancy settings - if I can figure it out G Beverly - who is going for the standard 10,000 steps per day since I spend most of my day seated at a computer. I have a pedometer question. I got a freebie pedometer with some Citrucel I bought, and wore it today for the first time. I had an uncommonly sedentary day. We couldn't walk at lunchtime because it was pouring rain, and it this is one of my gym days off. And I wasn't very active at work -- just a bit of walking around the hallways, to and from the cafeteria at lunchtime (it's a ways -- big building -- but still no big deal), walking to and from my car in the parking lot (also a ways), etc. Well, right now my pedometer reads 5296 steps, which seems like rather a lot for an inactive day. But I can also switch it to display miles walked -- though of course it doesn't know my stride length, so I'm not sure how it's computing this -- and it shows .985 miles. This seems entirely plausible given my inactivity. But I thought that in general a mile was on the order of 2000 steps. So I don't understand whether one of these numbers is wrong, or how the pedometer is computing the mileage from the step count, or what's going on. Any thoughts? I'm hesitant to make much use of this if what it does isn't making sense to me. My free McDonald's pedometer seems to increase the count like crazy whenever I sway back and forth. For example, I can get 1000 steps by folding laundry (standing in one place.) Lowering my pants to go to the bathroom is worth 200 steps. :-) That said, a fairly sedentary day where you walk around the parking lot, back and forth a ways to the cafeteria and then maybe stop at the grocery store could be about 6000 steps. The lowest I've seen on a very sedentary day for me was around 3500 steps and that's with NO commute and lunch 20 feet down the hall. Dally |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
SnugBear wrote:
Dally wrote: Weird. That's 5.5 pounds in 10 days. My normal rate over the summer was about 1 pound a month. I guess "practicing maintenance" is over! Super! Congratulations Dally. Thanks. I'm also making slow by steady progress in the droopy overhang of a stomach. I distinctly remember when it was like two balls of pizza dough. Now it's more like one... and I can't toss it in the air anymore. :-) Dally 244/171/168 (I usually round these numbers up out of superstition.) |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
SnugBear wrote:
Dally wrote: Weird. That's 5.5 pounds in 10 days. My normal rate over the summer was about 1 pound a month. I guess "practicing maintenance" is over! Super! Congratulations Dally. Thanks. I'm also making slow by steady progress in the droopy overhang of a stomach. I distinctly remember when it was like two balls of pizza dough. Now it's more like one... and I can't toss it in the air anymore. :-) Dally 244/171/168 (I usually round these numbers up out of superstition.) |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus26161 wrote:
Dally, most outstanding progress on your part, you should be proud... Strangely, "sheepish" is a word that comes to mind. I'm a bit embarrassed that I ever got that fat. Admitting how much I've lost means admitting how fat I got. Dally |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus26161 wrote:
In article , Dally wrote: Ignoramus26161 wrote: Dally, most outstanding progress on your part, you should be proud... Strangely, "sheepish" is a word that comes to mind. I'm a bit embarrassed that I ever got that fat. Admitting how much I've lost means admitting how fat I got. Let's get real here, 244 lbs for yur size is extremely fat... Why did you say that? I just said it embarrasses me, I don't like thinking about it. Do you feel that I must face it at this point for some reason? Besides, you don't know. I had lean body mass of about 145 pounds back then: dense bones, lots of muscle... I was physically active and didn't shake like a bowl of jelly. No one who saw me straight on would have called me obese. Only in profile with my belly sticking out - partly damage from c-section and three pregnancies - did I look obese. And that belly was empty - you could punch it down with a girdle. Not the well-packed lard you see on fat men. I was ~42% and I know what that means, but I suspect you don't. Dally |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus26161 wrote:
In article , Dally wrote: Ignoramus26161 wrote: Dally, most outstanding progress on your part, you should be proud... Strangely, "sheepish" is a word that comes to mind. I'm a bit embarrassed that I ever got that fat. Admitting how much I've lost means admitting how fat I got. Let's get real here, 244 lbs for yur size is extremely fat... Why did you say that? I just said it embarrasses me, I don't like thinking about it. Do you feel that I must face it at this point for some reason? Besides, you don't know. I had lean body mass of about 145 pounds back then: dense bones, lots of muscle... I was physically active and didn't shake like a bowl of jelly. No one who saw me straight on would have called me obese. Only in profile with my belly sticking out - partly damage from c-section and three pregnancies - did I look obese. And that belly was empty - you could punch it down with a girdle. Not the well-packed lard you see on fat men. I was ~42% and I know what that means, but I suspect you don't. Dally |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Our pal Dally wrote:
snip Dally 244/171/168 (I usually round these numbers up out of superstition.) Heh! I'm glad I'm not the only one. I'm also trying to only weigh myself once per week, as that became my habit over the summer... -- J.J. in WA ~ mom, vid gamer, novice cook ~ "I rule you!" - Travis of the Cosmos, ATHF (COLD to HOT for e-mail) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Here are some WW's Dessert Recipes | SPOONS | Weightwatchers | 3 | August 24th, 2004 01:06 AM |
Water: the key to weight loss | Philip Miranda | Weightwatchers | 6 | April 18th, 2004 10:22 AM |
Water & 20 Tips For Getting Your 8 Glasses Daily | Celtic Gal \(Vanessa\) | Weightwatchers | 3 | February 3rd, 2004 12:42 PM |
Everyone tells me I need to drink at least 8 cups of WATER a day | [email protected] | Weightwatchers | 4 | November 4th, 2003 09:58 AM |
Why Drinking Water Really is the Key to Weight Loss | John | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 5 | October 20th, 2003 08:28 PM |