A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Eat Right For Your Blood Type



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 24th, 2004, 10:09 PM
OceanView
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mark C" wrote in
:

"conjason" wrote in message
...
Has anyone done or doing this diet? I am so interested in
this diet and would like to know why there are not many
people mentioning this diet.

I think this is the best!

think about the concept for a moment. Our bodies were
'designed' hundreds of thousands of years ago, and havn't
evolved much over the past tens of thousands of years.

People from thousands of years ago didn't know their blood
type, and managed to survive without getting obese. what's
changed between then and now? sugar. refined, cheap and
copious amounts of sugar.

Drop the sugar, exercise more, and get plenty of protein,
vitamins and essential fats. The rest will take care of
itself.




Sugar, yes. Also, to a great degree, exercise. Even as
recently as 100-120 years ago most of the civilized world was
agrarian and worked the fields all day. Then industrial. Now
we sit on our asses and type (like I'm doing!) We have to
'make' time to exercise, rather than it being integrated.

--
---------------
"Teach a child to read and he or her will be able to pass a
literacy test."—George W Bush, Townsend, Tenn., Feb. 21, 2001
  #12  
Old August 24th, 2004, 10:09 PM
OceanView
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mark C" wrote in
:

"conjason" wrote in message
...
Has anyone done or doing this diet? I am so interested in
this diet and would like to know why there are not many
people mentioning this diet.

I think this is the best!

think about the concept for a moment. Our bodies were
'designed' hundreds of thousands of years ago, and havn't
evolved much over the past tens of thousands of years.

People from thousands of years ago didn't know their blood
type, and managed to survive without getting obese. what's
changed between then and now? sugar. refined, cheap and
copious amounts of sugar.

Drop the sugar, exercise more, and get plenty of protein,
vitamins and essential fats. The rest will take care of
itself.




Sugar, yes. Also, to a great degree, exercise. Even as
recently as 100-120 years ago most of the civilized world was
agrarian and worked the fields all day. Then industrial. Now
we sit on our asses and type (like I'm doing!) We have to
'make' time to exercise, rather than it being integrated.

--
---------------
"Teach a child to read and he or her will be able to pass a
literacy test."—George W Bush, Townsend, Tenn., Feb. 21, 2001
  #13  
Old August 24th, 2004, 11:36 PM
Dally
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OceanView wrote:

Dally wrote in
:


conjason wrote:

Has anyone done or doing this diet? I am so interested in
this diet and would like to know why there are not many
people mentioning this diet.

I think this is the best!


Well, it's utter nonsense, for one thing.

Diet books sells diets. We give knowledge away for free.
Are you buying or learning?

Dally




Coming soon: Dally's "Get a Grip" no-diet book!


Nope. I'll just put Krista's link in my sig file.

http://www.stumptuous.com/weights.html (read the Eating section)

Dally

  #14  
Old August 25th, 2004, 05:24 AM
MU
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:

That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.


Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.
  #15  
Old August 25th, 2004, 05:24 AM
MU
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:

That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.


Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.
  #16  
Old August 25th, 2004, 06:57 AM
Bob (this one)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

MU wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:


That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.



Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.


About as dead as your credibility. Say, did you ever look it up after
I showed you that you didn't know what it meant?

Bob

  #17  
Old August 25th, 2004, 06:57 AM
Bob (this one)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

MU wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:


That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.



Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.


About as dead as your credibility. Say, did you ever look it up after
I showed you that you didn't know what it meant?

Bob

  #18  
Old August 25th, 2004, 09:47 AM
Lictor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"OceanView" wrote in message
...
Sugar, yes. Also, to a great degree, exercise. Even as
recently as 100-120 years ago most of the civilized world was
agrarian and worked the fields all day. Then industrial. Now
we sit on our asses and type (like I'm doing!) We have to
'make' time to exercise, rather than it being integrated.


Another thing that changed is dietetical innocence. Back then, people didn't
know how to eat properly, so they relied their own hunger and appetite. One
of the side effect of exercise, outside of just burning calories, is added
body consciousness. People who exercise tend to be better tuned to their
body and feelings.
Now, everyone knows about carbs, proteins, caloric needs and all. And
obesity is increasing at a dramatic pace. Ironic isn't it?


  #19  
Old August 25th, 2004, 09:47 AM
Lictor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"OceanView" wrote in message
...
Sugar, yes. Also, to a great degree, exercise. Even as
recently as 100-120 years ago most of the civilized world was
agrarian and worked the fields all day. Then industrial. Now
we sit on our asses and type (like I'm doing!) We have to
'make' time to exercise, rather than it being integrated.


Another thing that changed is dietetical innocence. Back then, people didn't
know how to eat properly, so they relied their own hunger and appetite. One
of the side effect of exercise, outside of just burning calories, is added
body consciousness. People who exercise tend to be better tuned to their
body and feelings.
Now, everyone knows about carbs, proteins, caloric needs and all. And
obesity is increasing at a dramatic pace. Ironic isn't it?


  #20  
Old August 25th, 2004, 02:00 PM
Dally
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lictor wrote:

Now, everyone knows about carbs, proteins, caloric needs and all. And
obesity is increasing at a dramatic pace. Ironic isn't it?


I strongly disagree with your first sentence.

In my experience, most people can't tell you a wild guess at the
macronutrient ratio of what they eat within 20%. And they have NO IDEA
how many calories they eat or even how many calories they OUGHT to eat.

SO, obesity is increasing at a dramatic pace. Makes sense, doesn't it?

Dally


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oh, brother (I roll my eyes) Eva Whitley Low Carbohydrate Diets 206 May 23rd, 2004 04:45 PM
questions about D'Amato's "blood type diet" Ted Shoemaker General Discussion 13 March 5th, 2004 07:32 PM
anyone have info on Anglea Woollcombe Weightwatchers 45 January 8th, 2004 02:19 PM
Off Blood Pressure Meds Jenny Low Carbohydrate Diets 2 December 26th, 2003 12:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.