If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#681
|
|||
|
|||
grammar, etc.
so be it. my position is still not negotiable.
I was attacked in other threads. I have since stopped posting to other threads and resided here till the dust settles so at least normal denizens can ignore this thread (damage control) I am surprised no one has attacked my normal post night. maybe most have decided to leave me alone. Nothing but normal friendly replies. Chris Taylor http://www.nerys.com/ "Steve" wrote in message .com... On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 3:33:14 -0400, Chris Taylor Jr wrote (in message ): if evertime I post you trolls hammer my threads with "this ****" then people will tend to avoid my threads. that is the SAME THING as preventing me from posting IE the end result is effectively the same. You know, Pal, this is makes you out to be some kind of victim and martyr. I haven't seen anyone "hammering" you in on-topic threads. _You_ jumped into an off-topic thread on grammar and took positions which were in-your-face, inflammatory, and controversial and you got the response an "old usenet hand" like you should have expected... and you continue to feed the fire instead of just letting it go. Now you are trying to play poor, persecuted Chris who is only fighting for Truth, Justice, and the American way against the Blue Meanies. Sorry... doesn't wash. No crocodile tears here for you, sonny. Steve |
#682
|
|||
|
|||
grammar, etc.
so be it.
Chris Taylor http://www.nerys.com/ No plonk here....just a slow shake of the head and the fervent hope that if my life ever becomes as hopeless and devoid of meaning as yours surely seems to be, I will have the wisdom to recognize it and be honest enough with myself to do something about it. Regards, and I hope you find some on-topic threads here to which you are able to contribute. -- Wayne Crannell |
#683
|
|||
|
|||
grammar, etc.
Was that post an attack. ?
Was it a flame ? Was it a taunt ? Redicule ? Insult ? of any kind shape or form. NO it was a perfectly normal post/reply/opinion My statement below was limited to attacks/flames/trollings etc.. I originated NOTHING of that sort and you know it. Chris Taylor http://www.nerys.com/ "Steve" wrote in message .com... On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 3:40:25 -0400, Chris Taylor Jr wrote (in message ): I never originated a SINGLE statement. NOT A SINGLE SENTENCE on ANY of the above topics. EVERY post has been a REPLY to an attack. this is not up for discussion. you can not DISCUSS it or ARGUE this. it is forever retained in news archives. google it. It is hard FACT not up for negotiation. I started absolutely NONE of this. LOL :-) Perhaps you forget your original post in this thread on Sept. 28: well the problem with correcting people is this. 99% of the time the correction comes and is used in battle as part of ones attack on another. a way of side stepping the issue. Personally I see Newsgroups like chat (on and off line) its casual. I got sick of remembering which their or there to use. I just type which ever keys my fingers his. In what way would you consider that not originating a statement? Go back to bed, martyr-boy. Steve |
#684
|
|||
|
|||
grammar, etc.
Below
I guess it was your evil twin, then. Prove it. I NEVER originated a single post in this arena (IE a post that was an attack/insult/flame etc. etc..) my first post here was an attempt to "talk" to get "known" I got my ass torn off for it. GO read my first post to this thread. Second Ingredient. they simply want to utter flame bait See above. all the same remarks apply. the attacks are meant just as that. attacks. not to further discussion not to talk about low carb. Just to attack. Why ? Who knows that is why you are called TROLLS Ah, you want to play the "you started it first" game. Sorry. It doesn't work that way. You just posted six new messages to this thread, just to keep the flamefest going. Flame bait. All yours. Sorry it does work that way. I may not start it but I will end it. its the only way to make sure the ones attacking me are not likely to "start it" again in the future. They will usually choose not to start it again in the future because they know what I will do. I will continue to reply till the flamers get the idea and leave me alone (in so far as flames/trolls etc.. go) Next ... their is one ingredient you forgot about. Trolls tend to not hang around. they usually drop their load and them fly off and watch the carnage from a distance. There's all kinds of trolls. Look at Roose/Mu -- he keeps coming back, ad nauseum, just to keep the negative attention coming. You're a little like that, sweetie, begging to be paid attention to through whining, bullying and posting challenges. Trolling, that's called. actually I want LESS attention. that is the objective of this thread to me now. although a side effect is more attention now the end result is FAR LESS attention from undesirables later for fear of "this" kind of thread occuring again. in order for this to work I must prevail. Stopping first would invite future attacks and not satisfy the goal of LESS attention. Next ... you guys are like slime. you STICK and won't stop so ignoring does not work. you hammer at it and try to beat your victum into submission. Pot, kettle, black. Who's the one who beat his chest and said that he wouldn't ever stop responding to critical posts as a matter of pride? Not critical. their is a VERY big different between a critical reply and flames and attacks and insults. if you can not see this difference I am sorry I thought you were more intelligent than that (and that is not meant as an insult but as a matter of fact) they are NOT the same and you know it. Being critical is me correcting my sister on how to prnounce a word. What you guys do would be equivalent to me yelling outloud you IDIOT this is how you say it. can you not get that. they are very different beasts. That would be you. Posting about ten times more often on this subject than I am. Outlasting persistant trolls is the only way I know to get them to leave me alone. period. Submitting to them not being an option. I have no problem saying ego will not allow that. Sorry I am not a victum and I submit to NO ONE under any conditions. You sure sound like you see yourself as a victim. "Wahhh, everyone's picking on me! Wahhh, you guys started it! Wahhhh, I can't post on-topic because I have to type 47 responses to the thread where everyone is telling me that I'm a ****head!" Yet my heart, strangely, does not bleed for you. above "you" references those attacking me in general here. Perhaps if you'd just admitted that English isn't your native tongue, none of this would have happened, Yoda. Perhaps if people would not become hostile none of this would have happened. Wow what a thought. Chris Taylor http://www.nerys.com/ |
#685
|
|||
|
|||
grammar, etc.
blah blah blah
"M.W. Smith" wrote in message ... "Chris Taylor Jr" wrote in message Does not work that way. the only way this will end is if you stop replying to me. Call it dominance call it whatever you want. I call it making sure I win so you will be reluctant to screw with me in the future. I see. You think I'm screwing with you. You've just given me control. Now you have to respond to everything I do. Bottom posting is rude inconsiderate and a waste of time. Yes, bottom posting is just as rude and inconsiderate as top posting, and for exactly the same reasons. That's why nobody suggested that bottom posting was correct. Interleaving is correct, as I have done. I don't care whether you post correctly or not, but notice that I didn't include and didn't even read the rest of your post. You posted it incorrectly, so I ignored it. You wasted whatever little time you spent on it. And now you have to respond to whatever I do. Too bad. martin |
#686
|
|||
|
|||
grammar, etc.
Alas this thread consumes a lot of resources. but that could result in me
not having to devote any such resources to it again in the future. if I submit then I will get nibbled at on and off at peoples leisure since they know I will submit. Unacceptable. but fighting now could result in peace later. Worth fighting for. Just leave me alone and I can start reading more of the other threads on this forum. Chris Taylor http://www.nerys.com/ "jamie" wrote in message ... Chris Taylor Jr wrote: All I want is for them to leave me alone. to stay out of my way and let me enjoy this forum. That's all I want and I will fight visciously to aquire that goal if I have to. It certainly looks as though this thread is the *only* one in which you have any interest. Obviously, what you are enjoying *is* your little flame campaign for the last word, and the forum in which the thread occurs is irrelevant. If you want people to leave you alone, STFU about "winning" via your persistence of verbal diarreah, and participate in LC discussion. -- jamie ) "There's a seeker born every minute." |
#687
|
|||
|
|||
grammar, etc.
well it certaintly is not the same as irl fighting if that is what you mean.
but persistance does pay off online. people get bored wasting lots of time. so if I waste lots of their time they get bored with me and keep their distance. the viscious part references the persistance. IE I keep at it till I nail the point home. Chris Taylor http://www.nerys.com/ "JC Der Koenig" wrote in message ... You call this fighting? Fighting viciously? hahaha! -- JC Lyle's New Ultimate Diet "1. eat less you fat **** 2. exercise more you fat ****" "Chris Taylor Jr" wrote in message ... These people follow me from thread to thread. They can not make me leave but they can make it very annoying and uncomfortable to stay. they can coerce me into voluntarily leaving. I am also a bit bullheaded about this sort of thing. Giving into them admits defeat to me. I want them to LOSE with the result of them not wanting to EVER screw with me again. if I make their life miserable (and mine as well) the result is they leave me alone but it also results if I stick it out with them leaving me alone in the future. IE too much trouble for their time. Its probably pointless and probably an ego thing (on my part and theirs) to at least some extent. but its also an issue of principles. My "literacy" is not bad here. sure I make a lot of spelling errors but that is sloppy typing not sloppy spelling. I turned on spell check once in OE and very quickly turned it back off. I have been getting better. as my accuracy catches up with my typing speed I make fewer mistakes. I tend to forgo punctuation. its just not important to me on these kinds of forums. that may and does annoy some people but it tends to ONLY become an issue when an "argument" arrises. then it is used as canon fodder against me otherwise it is almost never brought up. I am coherent. sure there are technical errors galore but I am not hard to understand until I get angry at which time I type even faster and sloppier in an attempt to keep up with the onslaught and make many more errors. sometimes my "thought" gets ahead of my hands and I skip words but because I "thought" them I do not realize I missed them till I read my own post or someone nitpicks it to death. but if you read a normal post (not unlike this one) those massive errors are not as present. I type as I think. so as the words appear in my mind my hand types them. That is why I see newsgroups as "chit chat" because that is how I use them. I do not formulate thought. Revise correct and post. I type thoughts as they are formed in my mind. problems occur when those thoughts get ahead of my typing. I guess you could compare it to a CD skipping ahead to catch up. As I said though this usually only occurs in massive flame wars. I get angry and sloppy especially as I try to reply to ever post (sometimes DOZENS at a time) When I get into a flame war I tend to drift away from quality toward quantity. All I want is for them to leave me alone. to stay out of my way and let me enjoy this forum. That's all I want and I will fight visciously to aquire that goal if I have to. Its so much easier IRL When someone gets on my case (rare as I am a rather large individual) I just give them a look or I hit them if it gets physical (never has yet) Problems are solved decisively and quickly. Online though the seperation of mind and body and distance and annonymity gives people brass balls to bully and annoy other people (trolls) it is most aggravating. Chris Taylor http://www.nerys.com/ "Luna" wrote in message ... I don't understand that. No one has the power to keep you from posting here. Maybe if people really are bullying you, by fighting back you just make them want to fight you more. If someone truly is a troll, then their goal is to get you to respond, and if you continue to fight with them then they've won, they've reached their goal. Being ignored is the one thing that trolls can't stand, and the one thing that will get you fastest to your goal, i.e. them leaving you alone. If I see someone being picked on or insulted in real life, and they just walk on by like they barely even notice it, then they look like they're the better person, the stronger person, they have enough dignity to give the silent message "I am too good for this kind of crap." But if they respond and fight back, they look weak and scared. Who cares what some idiot says about you or to you? Maybe fighting back eventually tires out a bully so that they move on to another target, but the message it sends to those watching the fight is that the person being bullied has given weight to what the bullies say, it sends the message to the bully of "I respect you enough to think what you're saying is important enough for me to respond to." It doesn't even matter what the response IS, just the fact that there is a response makes it look like you're not secure enough to ignore someone who should mean nothing to you. Ignoring trolls and bullies and limiting your posts to helping people who DO matter to you, asking for help from people you DO respect, and posting to share your personal experiences with low-carb would make give you a reputation of being an intelligent, warm, kind and dignified person, and all you have to go on in the Internet is your reputation. Don't just think about the effect your posts have on bullies, consider the people lurking here who may be ignoring you because they see you as "that guy who won't stop arguing about top posting." It would be a shame for those people to miss out on what you have to say about more important things. Everyone has the power to create the impression they make. In our non-conformist society it is popular and clichéd to say "I don't care what other people think" but caring about what other people think is part of what makes us part of human society. It's up to each individual to decide WHICH people's opinions of them matter, for instance, I don't care what a troll on usenet thinks of me, but I DO care if my best friend respects me. |
#688
|
|||
|
|||
grammar, etc.
"Chris Taylor Jr" wrote in message
Does not work that way. the only way this will end is if you stop replying to me. Call it dominance call it whatever you want. I call it making sure I win so you will be reluctant to screw with me in the future. I see. You think I'm screwing with you. You've just given me control. Now you have to respond to everything I do. Bottom posting is rude inconsiderate and a waste of time. Yes, bottom posting is just as rude and inconsiderate as top posting, and for exactly the same reasons. That's why nobody suggested that bottom posting was correct. Interleaving is correct, as I have done. I don't care whether you post correctly or not, but notice that I didn't include and didn't even read the rest of your post. You posted it incorrectly, so I ignored it. You wasted whatever little time you spent on it. And now you have to respond to whatever I do. Too bad. martin |
#689
|
|||
|
|||
Regardless /Irregardless ...........
"Wayne Crannell" wrote in message ... In article , Nina wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:25:33 -0400, "Mathilda Jane" wrote: Nina wrote in message Well, until you actually provide evidence that you actually write for a living, then everyone has no reason to believe that you're anything but a sad fat girl who's incredibly jealous of everyone who actually does. If I had time to maintain a personal web site where I posted my inner thoughts to for the world to see, would that classify me as a writer in your book? If said site is published as a book, or is developed as a television show, as mine is being considered to be, then I might consider you a professional. But anyone can have a web site, darling, even you. Professional writer means that you get paid for what you do, even make a living at it. I don't make my living off my web site, I make a living off television. You could try it, but I think they require two spaces after a period. Oh, and speaking of professional writing, you will remember that I am not the one who still thinks two spaces after a period is correct. If you need help moving beyond this, please see any Associated Press Style Guide and Libel Manual. Or Chicago Style Guide. Or APA Style... or any book, newspaper or magazine for that matter. As for me, I'm young, rich, and good-looking. Of course you are. That's why you are posting to a diet newsgroup. You are adorable. If you were able to use just a smidge of that supposed brain, you'd know that I lost my weight and hang around here for fun. And that's also why you don't feel thirty, you drive a Jetta with no air conditioning, you have undergone Botox injections and you buy most of your clothes secondhand. Exactly! Who needs to spend the money on something silly like a car or clothes, when I can spend on things that actually matter to me. You're catching on! It's been a blast, darling. Let's do it again, sometime, shall we? Sure. Alas, I don't think you're up to the task. Pity. xo Nina delicious! evil! calorie free! http://www.theslack.com (Now I know why I don't spar with Nina anymore....brilliant, and quite sure to put a spring in the step of all of us who are burdened by the thought that Tildy is actually running around without her medication.) *I* was wondering how many snide comments from the Tildster it would take before Nina took off the gloves. Not many. revek (and she hasn't even gotten warmed up yet) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/18/2003 |
#690
|
|||
|
|||
grammar, etc.
Chris Taylor Jr wrote:
I am surprised no one has attacked my normal post night. maybe most have decided to leave me alone. Nothing but normal friendly replies. you're easy to pick on when you're acting like a nutjob, but when you act like a "normal" person people are willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. but don't let that stop you from continuing to act like a nutjob, mmmkay? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins: The Scarlett A's.. Eat Carbs Stay Alive. | Steve Randy Shilts Bayt | General Discussion | 7 | June 25th, 2004 09:24 PM |
Uncovering the Atkins diet secret | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 135 | February 14th, 2004 04:56 PM |
Article; What Killed Dr. Atkins (N.Y. Times) | Carol Frilegh | General Discussion | 0 | February 11th, 2004 11:53 AM |
Atkins diet may reduce seizures in children with epilepsy | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 23 | December 14th, 2003 11:39 AM |
The Atkins Spousal Syndrome: Partners of Low-Carb Dieters Suffer | Mars at the Mu_n's Edge | General Discussion | 0 | October 28th, 2003 04:08 PM |