Funny!

Kirk Is wrote:

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
Kirk Is wrote:
Yes, if it was solely a matter of losing 1.2 lbs more / month, we'd be in
complete agreement.

It has very little to do with weight loss and almost everything to do
with changing ****ty, useless habits.

Little to do with weight loss? Then why bother mentioning it here?

If you have to ask...

Willow Herself wrote:

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
...
Kirk Is wrote:

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
The Historian wrote:

I still think her coffee thread with Kirk was pretty silly, however.

If advising people to eliminate sources of excessive, non-nutritive
calories from their daily intake is wrong, I don't want to be right.

I really didn't mean to get back into this, but...

Then don't.

I didn't give up my cheetos until long after I made goal.

Did I ever suggest that he give up coffee?

Kirk Is wrote:

But according to her majesty, newbies like me have no chance of making
such calculated decisions, so we need to use half and half in our coffee
instead of skim milk, in order to lose weight.

I never suggested that there was only one way. I never suggested that
"my way" was the right way.

All I did was suggest that there was a different way.

And all you did was make excuses for not even giving it a try.

You are the very essence of the Whiny Fat **** In Denial.

Willow Herself wrote:

My father in law, who's gone now, always said "It doesn't take all kinds to
make a world, we just have all kinds"

Wise man there...

Indeed. I rather like that one.

Kirk Is wrote:

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:

You are the very essence of the Whiny Fat **** In Denial.


Ooh, zing!

I'd amend that to say you were, but you aren't necessarily now. People
can grow out of that stage.

Dally

Dally wrote:

Kirk Is wrote:

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:

You are the very essence of the Whiny Fat **** In Denial.


Ooh, zing!

I'd amend that to say you were, but you aren't necessarily now. People
can grow out of that stage.

How many really have what it takes, though? You know what's involved.
How many people do you know who are willing to do the hard work? We've
got a reasonable group of them here, but I don't think they're
representative of people in general.

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
.. .
Kirk Is wrote:

But according to her majesty, newbies like me have no chance of making
such calculated decisions, so we need to use half and half in our coffee
instead of skim milk, in order to lose weight.

I never suggested that there was only one way. I never suggested that
"my way" was the right way.

All I did was suggest that there was a different way.

And all you did was make excuses for not even giving it a try.

You are the very essence of the Whiny Fat **** In Denial.


Oh nice... the insult add so much to the discussion... you're really proving
your point here..

Will~

Willow Herself wrote:

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote:
Kirk Is wrote:

But according to her majesty, newbies like me have no chance of making
such calculated decisions, so we need to use half and half in our coffee
instead of skim milk, in order to lose weight.

I never suggested that there was only one way. I never suggested that
"my way" was the right way.

All I did was suggest that there was a different way.

And all you did was make excuses for not even giving it a try.

You are the very essence of the Whiny Fat **** In Denial.

Oh nice... the insult add so much to the discussion... you're really proving
your point here..

Oh, boo ****ing hoo.

When someone is willing to continue whinging ad nauseum about their
right to consume crap on a daily basis while they're pretending to care
about making changes that are supposed to last a lifetime, that's Whiny
Fat ****iness.

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
Dally wrote:

Kirk Is wrote:

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:

You are the very essence of the Whiny Fat **** In Denial.


Ooh, zing!

I'd amend that to say you were, but you aren't necessarily now. People
can grow out of that stage.

How many really have what it takes, though? You know what's involved.
How many people do you know who are willing to do the hard work? We've
got a reasonable group of them here, but I don't think they're
representative of people in general.

No, they are not a representative group. If this were easy, everyone
would do it. Instead they found it difficult, and prefer to just talk
about doing it. It reminds me of Chesterson's comment on Christianity,
that it hasn't been tried and found a failure, but it has been found
difficult, and thus untried.

Neil
385/309/220

Willow Herself wrote:
"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in message
...
Kirk Is wrote:

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
The Historian wrote:

I still think her coffee thread with Kirk was pretty silly, however.

If advising people to eliminate sources of excessive, non-nutritive
calories from their daily intake is wrong, I don't want to be right.

I really didn't mean to get back into this, but...

Then don't.

I didn't give up my cheetos until long after I made goal. 1 serving (29
pieces) every night. about 200 calories.. .I still lost 70 lbs in 9
months... I've now been maintaining for almost 3 years. Shouldn't everyone
get to chose where they cut and where they won't?
Will~

Agreed. I still have the occasional soft pretzel or other piece of junk
food. And I'm sure that other elements of my diet can be criticized. So
what? I'm doing well in so many other places that I don't care.

That's why this entire debate is so ridiculous. Kirk isn't going to be
undone by a daily coffee, anymore than "Cheese" will be destroyed by a
pancake. Or "Willow" by a Cheeto. Although I am glad you gave those
awful things the boot. :-)

Neil
385/309/220