Evolutionary approach to weight

27/09/2007 UK Daily Telegraph

William Leith reviews Waistland: the (R)evolutionary Science behind
our Weight and Fitness Crises by Deirdre Barrett

At the start of this sensible book about the "weight and fitness
crisis" in America, the Harvard psychologist Deirdre Barrett tells us
some shocking things. By 1995, she says, two-thirds of Americans were
overweight, hundreds of thousands were dying fat-related deaths, being
overweight was people's most common gripe and obesity was poised to
overtake smoking as the biggest cause of preventable death. All of
this, she says, accounted for $99 billion in medical costs.

What's more shocking is that, as she points out, in the decade since
then, things have got much worse - by 2004, people were eating 50 per
cent more fast food, and the annual medical bill had risen to $117
billion. The problem, in other words, is bad, and it's getting worse,
and we can't seem to stop it. So why does fattening food - sugar,
starch and fat itself - have such a grip on us?

The answer, says Barrett, lies in the study of evolution. As animals,
we are genetically almost identical to our Stone Age ancestors. We
live in advanced societies, with supermarkets and cars and lifts, but
we are built to be hunter-gatherers. We are programmed to seek out
fat, sugar, starch and salt, because, in the Stone Age, these things
were hard to come by. When they turn up in abundance, our bodies, for
the most part, can't say no.

She tells us lots of interesting things about our hunter-gatherer
ancestors, who immediately preceded the first farmers. The point about
farming, she says, is that, although it makes populations bigger and
tribes more powerful, it's not necessarily healthier for the
individual.

Rest of article he http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main...7/bobar122.xml

Book he
http://www.amazon.com/Waistland-evol...1089117&sr=8-1