If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Atkins was right
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:34:01 +1200, "Supergoof"
wrote: "Sleepyman" wrote ... "Supergoof" wrote: If obesity led directly to diabetes, then all obese people should be diabetic, and there should be no skinny diabetics. Any doc who says obesity causes diabetes, is wrong. If anything the opposite may be true. Many think that insulin resistance in a diabetic, is what causes weight gain. Thanks. I guess I'm lucky in that my doc said as much to me - when she told me about the IR and how it made my body exceptionally good at gaining and keeping weight, I joked "so you mean I'm not fat because I eat to much and don't exercise?" She deadpanned "most people aren't." In the case of most people with normal metabolism, and no diseases, I disagree wholeheartedly with your doc. The standards for being Dx'd diabetes, have changed radically in the last few years. Thus many would not have been Dx'd a few years ago, now are. Thus more diabetics. Why have the standards changed? Is it pressure from the drug companies selling diabetes meds (my cynical side likes to believe this). Actually, the insurance companies save money with a lower threshold for a diabetes dx. The earlier it is caught the more likely it can be controlled with D&E, and complications have not set in. So in the long run, the earlier the dx the better for all. Of course this is assuming that the diabetic actually does make the minor life style changes need to control the disease. Unfortunately, this is often not the case. Insulin resistance is a warning. It is not a diagnoses on it's own however. We are also seeing a rise in Diabetes diagnoses, because many pre-disposed people in fact *are* eating a more dangerous diet. When you think about it, so many 'low fat' products contain higher sugars than the regular variety of the same food, so while trying to be healthier people are actually eating more sugar than ever before. True. When I was first dx'd, I was sent to nutrition classes where they try to sell the higher carb, lower fat ADA style diet, complete with the food pyramid. I didn't buy it. In fact when I told the dietician that full fat milk had less carb than fat free or skim milk, she didn't believe me. And people wonder why I rip dieticians so much! No wonder people don't know who to believe any more. cheers Rachel (New Zealand) Sleepy ____________________________________ The True Axis of Evil Bush - Cheney - Ashcroft - Rumsfeld ____________________________________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof. | marengo | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 173 | April 17th, 2004 11:26 PM |
Dr. ATKINS IS A QUACK | Irv Finkleman | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 5 | March 31st, 2004 12:37 PM |
Atkins Group says easy on the sat fat | Tabi Kasanari | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 27 | January 21st, 2004 07:47 PM |
Atkins Refresher - From Atkins Online Support | Ropingirl | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 1 | December 18th, 2003 08:10 PM |
Was Atkins Right After All? | Ken Kubos | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 5 | November 22nd, 2003 11:01 PM |