Offensive e-mail INFO?

Hello Priscilla,
For the sake of nailing him/her down more precisely would you please
post the headers from the email? shows up in
Google variously as "Penny" "Laura" "Bearz" "Penny Nunes" "Barry".
There are other references of private emails from that address being
sent where the recipient was less than pleased, so it looks like a
pattern of sorts.

Take care,
Carmen

In article ,
"Carmen " wrote:

Hello Priscilla,
For the sake of nailing him/her down more precisely would you please
post the headers from the email? shows up in
Google variously as "Penny" "Laura" "Bearz" "Penny Nunes" "Barry".
There are other references of private emails from that address being
sent where the recipient was less than pleased, so it looks like a
pattern of sorts.

Here you go:
Return-Path:
Received: from TheWorld.com ([199.172.62.104]) by mta016.verizon.net
(InterMailvM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id
20030919235055.WDBU27786.mta016.verizon.net@TheWo rld.com for
; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:50:55 -0500
Received: from smtp.dslextreme.com (smtp.dslextreme.com [66.51.205.17])
by TheWorld.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8JNeEjx018374 for
; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 19:40:15 -0400
Received: from pentiump3 (dial-in-66-218-206-132.dslextreme.com
[66.159.206.132] (may be forged)) by smtp.dslextreme.com (8.12.8/8.12.5)
with SMTP id h8JNaqbu031957 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003
16:36:52 -0700
Message-ID: 004d01c37f07$60951ef0$84ce9f42@pentiump3
From: "blau"
To: "Priscilla Ballou"
References:

Subject: medieval diet
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:40:09 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
Disposition-Notification-To: "blau"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Mozilla-Status: 9011
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000
X-UIDL:

--
The Episcopal Church welcomes you... and you... and you....

Hi Priscilla,
On 20-Sep-2003, Priscilla Ballou wrote:

In article ,
"Carmen " wrote:

Hello Priscilla,
For the sake of nailing him/her down more precisely would you please
post the headers from the email? shows up
in Google variously as "Penny" "Laura" "Bearz" "Penny Nunes"
"Barry".
There are other references of private emails from that address being
sent where the recipient was less than pleased, so it looks like a
pattern of sorts.

Here you go:
Return-Path:
Received: from TheWorld.com ([199.172.62.104]) by mta016.verizon.net
(InterMailvM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id
20030919235055.WDBU27786.mta016.verizon.net@TheWo rld.com for
; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:50:55 -0500
Received: from smtp.dslextreme.com (smtp.dslextreme.com
[66.51.205.17])
by TheWorld.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8JNeEjx018374 for
; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 19:40:15 -0400
Received: from pentiump3 (dial-in-66-218-206-132.dslextreme.com
[66.159.206.132] (may be forged)) by smtp.dslextreme.com
(8.12.8/8.12.5)
with SMTP id h8JNaqbu031957 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003
16:36:52 -0700
Message-ID: 004d01c37f07$60951ef0$84ce9f42@pentiump3
From: "blau"
To: "Priscilla Ballou"
References:


Subject: medieval diet
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:40:09 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
Disposition-Notification-To: "blau"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Mozilla-Status: 9011
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000
X-UIDL:

Thank you for taking the time to post it. It does come from DSLExtreme,
and it looks like a dial-up account but other than that it doesn't tell
much, does it? I checked, and DSLExtreme's Acceptable Use Policy
doesn't allow "harassment", so if you wanted to file a complaint against
the person you'd have grounds to do so. In Google the posts from that
address seem to come in two distinct "personalities" - a husband and
wife perhaps. Or maybe just a very moody single individual.
You and he/she/it have had words in the past. (http://tinyurl.com/o5gh)
Is this the first time they've gone the email route?

Take care,
Carmen

In article ,
"Carmen " wrote:

Hi Priscilla,

Thank you for taking the time to post it. It does come from DSLExtreme,
and it looks like a dial-up account but other than that it doesn't tell
much, does it? I checked, and DSLExtreme's Acceptable Use Policy
doesn't allow "harassment", so if you wanted to file a complaint against
the person you'd have grounds to do so.

I did that just before I posted his email here. I mailed it to
abuse@dslextreme.

In Google the posts from that
address seem to come in two distinct "personalities" - a husband and
wife perhaps. Or maybe just a very moody single individual.
You and he/she/it have had words in the past. (http://tinyurl.com/o5gh)
Is this the first time they've gone the email route?

Interesting. I'd forgotten all about that. Well, it was 1.5 years ago,
so I don't think I need to blame my middle-aged brain for it.

What makes this weekend even more interesting is that about an hour ago
I received a telephone threat. The person asked for me by name, then
said something like, "Priscilla Ballou, you f*cking ho, I'm going to
stomp your face!" at which point I hung up on them and called 911. This
is totally unrelated to the email jerk, but it's kind of thrown me off
my pace. The "non-emergency group" is supposed to be calling me back to
tell me about an harassment hotline they have.

I think the threat might be related to a phone call earlier this
afternoon. I was called by the campaign office of one of the
presidential candidates, and the caller refused to listen to me when I
said I didn't accept telephone solicitation calls and to place me on
their Do Not Call list. He just kept talking while I repeated myself at
increasing volume. Finally, I was yelling and he was still talking
about how I'd supported the candidate in the past, so I hung up... and
then found the number for the local office, called them, and left a
voice mail complaint. I did not, however, leave my name with the
complaint, but the system could very well have collected my phone
number. If the telemarketer were disciplined or fired as a result, then
I could see his maybe turning around, pulling up my record, and calling
me to threaten me. It's just too much of a coincidence for those two
events to have happened within two hours of each other. And the voice
sounded similar.

I don't know that I've ever received a phone threat before, and I've
lived for half a century.

Priscilla, slightly freaked out
--
The Episcopal Church welcomes you... and you... and you....

Hi Priscilla,
What a day you've had - surrounded by jerks! That sounds like a "unplug
the phone and take a bubble bath with candlelight only" kind of evening.
:-)
DSLExtreme now knows (or will when they see the emails) about the
situation with Penny/Barry, and that'll likely put an end to that. If
you have CallerID you can let the answering machine get calls that come
up as "Out of Area" or "Unknown Caller" or "Private". If you don't you
can let the answering machine get 'em all. :-)

Take care,
Carmen

In article ,
"Carmen " wrote:

DSLExtreme now knows (or will when they see the emails) about the
situation with Penny/Barry, and that'll likely put an end to that.

I'm sorry, but I don't know what you're talking about. Penny/Barry?

Priscilla
--
The Episcopal Church welcomes you... and you... and you....

Good morning,
On 21-Sep-2003, Priscilla Ballou wrote:

In article ,
"Carmen " wrote:

DSLExtreme now knows (or will when they see the emails) about the
situation with Penny/Barry, and that'll likely put an end to that.

I'm sorry, but I don't know what you're talking about. Penny/Barry?

Those were two of the names I mentioned as being used with the
email address in an earlier post.

Take care,
Carmen

Good morning,

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:34:43 -0400, Carmen wrote

If you have CallerID you can let the answering machine get calls
that
come up as "Out of Area" or "Unknown Caller" or "Private". If you
don't
you can let the answering machine get 'em all. :-)

Steve wrote:
There is also a "star code" you can dial immediately after receiving
one of these calls that will give you their number even if you don't
have
caller id.
You can usually find it in the front of the phone book. In my area it
costs .50 per use but in situations like that it's worth it.

Carmen:
Yes! I'd forgotten all about that option, with CallerID. Back when I
had a serious problem with a "hang-up" caller (to the tune of 20+ calls
in a two-day time span that went off and on for several months) I tried
using that option. The phone company waived the fee due to the sheer
volume of calls. They never got a person to prosecute because the
phones were payphones. It just suddenly stopped one day. It took
months before I could hear the phone ring and not have my stomach get
jumpy.

Take care,
Carmen

In article ,
Steve wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:34:43 -0400, Carmen wrote
(in message ):

Hi Priscilla,
What a day you've had - surrounded by jerks! That sounds like a "unplug
the phone and take a bubble bath with candlelight only" kind of evening.
:-)
DSLExtreme now knows (or will when they see the emails) about the
situation with Penny/Barry, and that'll likely put an end to that. If
you have CallerID you can let the answering machine get calls that come
up as "Out of Area" or "Unknown Caller" or "Private". If you don't you
can let the answering machine get 'em all. :-)

There is also a "star code" you can dial immediately after receiving one of
these calls that will give you their number even if you don't have caller id.
You can usually find it in the front of the phone book. In my area it costs
.50 per use but in situations like that it's worth it.

When the police finally called back, they gave it to me. In this area
at least it's *57. Once you've done it three times, they will trace and
investigate.

Priscilla
--
The Episcopal Church welcomes you... and you... and you....

In article ,
Steve wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 6:55:23 -0400, Carmen wrote
(in message ):

Good morning,

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:34:43 -0400, Carmen wrote

If you have CallerID you can let the answering machine get calls
that
come up as "Out of Area" or "Unknown Caller" or "Private". If you
don't
you can let the answering machine get 'em all. :-)

Steve wrote:
There is also a "star code" you can dial immediately after receiving
one of these calls that will give you their number even if you don't
have
caller id.
You can usually find it in the front of the phone book. In my area it
costs .50 per use but in situations like that it's worth it.

Carmen:
Yes! I'd forgotten all about that option, with CallerID. Back when I
had a serious problem with a "hang-up" caller (to the tune of 20+ calls
in a two-day time span that went off and on for several months) I tried
using that option. The phone company waived the fee due to the sheer
volume of calls. They never got a person to prosecute because the
phones were payphones. It just suddenly stopped one day. It took
months before I could hear the phone ring and not have my stomach get
jumpy.


I forgot something too :-) There is also a feature called "Malicious Call
Trace" which is different than this one (which is called "retrieve last
number" or something like that). When you activate the malicious call trace
feature the last call made is traced and a record made. The record can only
be accessed by a law enforcement agency, but if you are getting threats that
shouldn't be a problem. Malicious Call Trace is activated by another star
code that you can look up or get from the phone company.

Oh, sorry, I misread the earlier post. What you're describing is *57,
which the police told me about last night.

Priscilla
--
The Episcopal Church welcomes you... and you... and you....