How I maintain my weight

"Did anyone get any idea what this joker just waffled?"

Of course, as did you. Which is why you bothered to reply in the first
place.

The two pound diet is trash science in its truth claims. You may at
leasure provide scientific proposed information to the contrary of
course, at which point real scientific discussion can begin.

I have read your posting three times and as far as I can understand,
you
didn't say anything. One thing was clear, though: you don't know how
to
spell "gimmick."

"The lack of knowledge is expected in the eternally condemned demons,
who are without the help of the LORD, Who is the Source of all
knowledge."

Lacking any valid scientific support for the trash science of the two
pound diet claims you are reduced to this?

May God bless you.

Mu wrote:

On 16 Apr 2007 01:39:39 GMT, wrote:

As a sensible person, I eat nutricious food daily, in fact, the same
foods I used to eat before starting this food regimen, just smaller
quantities. I never go hungry, although as I don't eat often after
dinner (about 6.30pm), I sometimes feel peckish on going to bed, which
a cup of organic cocoa helps me fall off to sleep easily.

Yep, eat less and lose weight. For some the accidental choice of what
foods to include in the two pounds combined with ones height and
activity levl will cause a weight loss. For others the result will be a
weight gain. It is a gimic, use standard measures of volume or set time
to eat the same foods and the same results will occur.

By accident one can find the right amount of calories for you or one can
quickly narrow it down by not relying on accident and matching calories
to height and activity level more directly and systematically.

The two pound diet is based on trash science in its truth claims.

Did anyone get any idea what this joker just waffled?

Care to point out anything he posted that is incorrect, coward?

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen

On 16 Apr 2007 01:39:39 GMT, wrote:

As a sensible person, I eat nutricious food daily, in fact, the same
foods I used to eat before starting this food regimen, just smaller
quantities. I never go hungry, although as I don't eat often after
dinner (about 6.30pm), I sometimes feel peckish on going to bed, which
a cup of organic cocoa helps me fall off to sleep easily.

Yep, eat less and lose weight. For some the accidental choice of what
foods to include in the two pounds combined with ones height and
activity levl will cause a weight loss. For others the result will be a
weight gain. It is a gimic, use standard measures of volume or set time
to eat the same foods and the same results will occur.

By accident one can find the right amount of calories for you or one can
quickly narrow it down by not relying on accident and matching calories
to height and activity level more directly and systematically.

The two pound diet is based on trash science in its truth claims.

Did anyone get any idea what this joker just waffled?

On 16 Apr, 02:39, wrote:
As a sensible person, I eat nutricious food daily, in fact, the same
foods I used to eat before starting this food regimen, just smaller
quantities. I never go hungry, although as I don't eat often after
dinner (about 6.30pm), I sometimes feel peckish on going to bed, which
a cup of organic cocoa helps me fall off to sleep easily.

Yep, eat less and lose weight. For some the accidental choice of what
foods to include in the two pounds combined with ones height and
activity levl will cause a weight loss. For others the result will be a
weight gain. It is a gimic, use standard measures of volume or set time
to eat the same foods and the same results will occur.

By accident one can find the right amount of calories for you or one can
quickly narrow it down by not relying on accident and matching calories
to height and activity level more directly and systematically.

The two pound diet is based on trash science in its truth claims.

Please be patient with me and this question. On insulin 50 years now
and recently have lost a lot of weight due to an illness not connected
to diabetes. There is one thing that I just don't understand after all
these years and for that I apologise. What actually puts weight on
more quickly. Is it an increase in carbs or and increase in calories.
Or should I take an increase in carbs that include higher calories.
Sorry guys, this old head can't get around this at all.

Tom

Tom wrote:
As a sensible person, I eat nutricious food daily, in fact, the same
foods I used to eat before starting this food regimen, just smaller
quantities. I never go hungry, although as I don't eat often after
dinner (about 6.30pm), I sometimes feel peckish on going to bed, which
a cup of organic cocoa helps me fall off to sleep easily.

Please be patient with me and this question. On insulin 50 years now
and recently have lost a lot of weight due to an illness not connected
to diabetes. There is one thing that I just don't understand after all
these years and for that I apologise. What actually puts weight on
more quickly. Is it an increase in carbs or and increase in calories.

Weight loss from illness (ie loss of appetite) is typically a loss of
lean body mass and not visceral adipose tissue. Regaining lost lean
body mass can not be hurried and will happen in time upon regaining
health (ie after regaining appetite)

Or should I take an increase in carbs that include higher calories.
Sorry guys, this old head can't get around this at all.

Your recovery from your illness simply will take time. Regaining lean
body mass will follow this recovery as a consequence and will not be a
factor in your recovery from your illness.

May GOD bless you.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth

"Please be patient with me and this question. On insulin 50 years now
and recently have lost a lot of weight due to an illness not connected
to diabetes. There is one thing that I just don't understand after all
these years and for that I apologise. What actually puts weight on
more quickly. Is it an increase in carbs or and increase in calories.
Or should I take an increase in carbs that include higher calories.
Sorry guys, this old head can't get around this at all."

First, there is nothing about which to be sorry. Diabetics is somewhat
a special case but in general we can more weight by eating more food
then we need to maintain our current weight at a given activity level.
We measure the energy content of a food by calories.

All the food that is in excess of needs is stored as fat regardless of
if it is protein, carbs or fat. Fat is the bodies storage method. In
times past when food was not so easily to hand and could be uncertain on
a regular basis we used the stored energy in fat. In these days we lose
fat by mimicking less food times by eating less so the stored energy is
used.

When one is ill it is often usual to eat less so there would be a loss
of stored fat for that reason. Some illnesses can also contribute to
weight loss by other methods.

Protein is used for many purposes other then as an energy source, in
building and maintaining some tissues such as muscle for example. If
during the time we eat less the same amount of protein is not maintained
then the body also uses such sources as muscles to have protein for
other important tissue reasons. So total weight loss can be the
combination of both of these stored cells.

A diabetic has to control carbs in the blood as you well know. Insulin
is the substance which causes carbs as glucose to enter cells and when
there is more carbs then we need for basic energy needs the excess is
stored as fat as already discussed.

In short if your doctor wants you to gain weight just eat more quality
foods of your choice keeping in mind that an increase in carbs means an
increase in insulin in your case. If your current weight is within
normal ranges then consider not adding weight, which also means less
insulin to serve less body tissue and from not eating some carbs to stay
where you are.

I hope the short outline helps you understand more about weight loss and
gain. Please feel free to ask any question.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Tom wrote:

As a sensible person, I eat nutricious food daily, in fact, the same
foods I used to eat before starting this food regimen, just smaller
quantities. I never go hungry, although as I don't eat often after
dinner (about 6.30pm), I sometimes feel peckish on going to bed, which
a cup of organic cocoa helps me fall off to sleep easily.

Please be patient with me and this question. On insulin 50 years now
and recently have lost a lot of weight due to an illness not connected
to diabetes. There is one thing that I just don't understand after all
these years and for that I apologise. What actually puts weight on
more quickly. Is it an increase in carbs or and increase in calories.


Weight loss from illness (ie loss of appetite) is typically a loss of
lean body mass and not visceral adipose tissue. Regaining lost lean
body mass can not be hurried and will happen in time upon regaining
health (ie after regaining appetite)


Or should I take an increase in carbs that include higher calories.
Sorry guys, this old head can't get around this at all.


Your recovery from your illness simply will take time. Regaining lean
body mass will follow this recovery as a consequence and will not be a
factor in your recovery from your illness.

May GOD bless you.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth



Kookle Search Results

30 matches for "chung".
Dr. Andrew B Chung
Rookie Kook of the Year, 2006
Coward of the Year, 2006
Bardley Annual "Whining Baby New Year" Award, 2007
Kook of the Month, June 2006
Golden Killfile, November 2006
Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award, June 2006
Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award, February 2007
Looney Maroon Award, June 2006
Looney Maroon Award, August 2006
Looney Maroon Award, January 2007
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, January 2007
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, January 2007
Coward of the Month, October 2006
Coward of the Month, November 2006
Coward of the Month, December 2006
Joseph Bartlo "Pathetic Anal Pineapple" Award, October 2006
Joseph Bartlo "Pathetic Anal Pineapple" Award, March 2007
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, December 2006
Busted Urinal Award
Unabomber Surprise
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #24
George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
Kluck Lysaght "Tar & Feathers" Award
Kenny McCormick Memorial Medal
Goofy Azzed Babboon
72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award
Fr00tcake, 2006
Edmond Wollmann Memorial Rubber Turkey Award, Easter Weekend 2006
Edmond Wollmann Memorial Rubber Turkey Award, Thanksgiving 2006
www.heartmdphd.com [Dr. Andrew B Chung]
Richbull.com Memorial Award for Kooksite of the Year, 2006

On 16 Apr 2007 15:08:07 -0700, "Tom" wrote:

On 16 Apr, 02:39, wrote:
As a sensible person, I eat nutricious food daily, in fact, the same
foods I used to eat before starting this food regimen, just smaller
quantities. I never go hungry, although as I don't eat often after
dinner (about 6.30pm), I sometimes feel peckish on going to bed, which
a cup of organic cocoa helps me fall off to sleep easily.

Yep, eat less and lose weight. For some the accidental choice of what
foods to include in the two pounds combined with ones height and
activity levl will cause a weight loss. For others the result will be a
weight gain. It is a gimic, use standard measures of volume or set time
to eat the same foods and the same results will occur.

By accident one can find the right amount of calories for you or one can
quickly narrow it down by not relying on accident and matching calories
to height and activity level more directly and systematically.

The two pound diet is based on trash science in its truth claims.

Please be patient with me and this question. On insulin 50 years now
and recently have lost a lot of weight due to an illness not connected
to diabetes. There is one thing that I just don't understand after all
these years and for that I apologise. What actually puts weight on
more quickly. Is it an increase in carbs or and increase in calories.
Or should I take an increase in carbs that include higher calories.
Sorry guys, this old head can't get around this at all.

Tom

You want to gain, then I suggest a rich combination of fat,
carbs,calories and protein.

The key here is to find the foods that taste good to you.

On 16 Apr 2007 15:08:07 -0700, Tom wrote:

Please be patient with me and this question. On insulin 50 years now
and recently have lost a lot of weight due to an illness not connected
to diabetes. There is one thing that I just don't understand after all
these years and for that I apologise. What actually puts weight on
more quickly. Is it an increase in carbs or and increase in calories.

When caloric intake exceeds caloric burn-off, you will have the tendency
to gain weight. Carbs, proteins and fats, the three "things with
calories that make up food molecularly all have calories in their
foodstuffs but in differing ratios fat = 9cal/gram, protein and carbs =
4 cals/gram (roughly for all)

http://www.nutristrategy.com/nutrition/calories.htm

Or should I take an increase in carbs that include higher calories.
Sorry guys, this old head can't get around this at all.

Tom

If you want to add weight most quickly, you would eat from the fat
groups of food in the list above since they are the most calorically
dense.