Lose Fat In Inches !

Truth:

The two pound diet,aka 2pd etc. is quack science. It has flaws of both
fact and logic. It was invented to fit a preexisting agenda and does
not flow from evidence based on research. The diet inventor has many
times been appraised of his flaws but clings to them for reasons other
then science or valid medical practice


All of this nonsense of measure by weight or volume comes from the
agenda fitting, not well established research. But sadly even the
agenda is based on misunderstood and misapplied information. Even when
corrected the author of the agenda for nothing but pride and vain face
saving can not deal with that truth.

Bottom line, ignore any reference to the two pound diet,aka 2 pd etc.
and stick with established information and sources of expert authorities
which does not include the vanity of vanity distorting reality in this
case.

God bless.

On 2009-05-03, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Dr Suzanne wrote:

New Breakthrough Secret discovered by lady doctor has other doctors
baffled!

Find out how Dr Suzanne Gudakunst discovered how calories, carbs, and
such have far less to do with the real reason you're fat and can't
seem to lose weight regardless of what you do!

It is impossible to eat less down to the right amount if you are
neither weighing your meals nor knowing what is the right amount.

Your absurd claim is trampled upon by billions of non overeating people
in the world who maintain a normal weight all their lives without
weighing their meals. And then there are the animals, too, by the way.

I don't disagree with the idea of eating two pounds of food, though.
For some, it could be the only way to get some kind of a lasting
grip on what goes into their mouths.

Kaz Kylheku wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dr Suzanne wrote:

New Breakthrough Secret discovered by lady doctor has other doctors
baffled!

Find out how Dr Suzanne Gudakunst discovered how calories, carbs, and
such have far less to do with the real reason you're fat and can't
seem to lose weight regardless of what you do!

It is impossible to eat less down to the right amount if you are
neither weighing your meals nor knowing what is the right amount.

Your absurd claim is trampled upon by billions of non overeating people
in the world who maintain a normal weight all their lives without
weighing their meals.

Those who are kept from needing to make a conscious decision to eat
less down to the right amount are those living in conditions arranged
by GOD where excess food is simply not available to them.

And then there are the animals, too, by the way.

The wild animals are not overweight because they are fed by GOD, Who
feeds them the right amount.

The animals in the care of overweight humans are overweight because
overweight humans overfeed their animals just as they overfeed
themselves.

Truth is simple.

May GOD soften your heart, Kaz, so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:

http://T3WiJ.com

Amen.

Love in the truth,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
http://WDJW.net

On Sun, 3 May 2009 20:13:04 -0500, Kaz Kylheku wrote
(in article ):

Your absurd claim is trampled upon by billions of non overeating people
in the world who maintain a normal weight all their lives without
weighing their meals. And then there are the animals, too, by the way.

Good point


I don't disagree with the idea of eating two pounds of food, though.
For some, it could be the only way to get some kind of a lasting
grip on what goes into their mouths.

It is just another way of reducing the amount of food someone eats as a way
to lose weight. Whether weighing or counting calories or smaller portions or
using point systems like in some diets, they are all the same. If one works
for you, stick to it. The problem with diets, and that includes all of them,
including the 2P, counting calories, smaller portions or points, is that
people do not stick to them so they gain the weight back.

On Sun, 3 May 2009 20:25:19 -0500, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
(in article
):

The wild animals are not overweight because they are fed by GOD, Who
feeds them the right amount.

Hmmmm ..... so a man eating tiger ..... God is feeding the man to the tiger.

On Mon, 4 May 2009 00:00:21 -0500, MM wrote:

It is just another way of reducing the amount of food someone eats as a way
to lose weight. Whether weighing or counting calories or smaller portions or
using point systems like in some diets, they are all the same. If one works
for you, stick to it. The problem with diets, and that includes all of them,
including the 2P, counting calories, smaller portions or points, is that
people do not stick to them so they gain the weight back.

duh
--
http://tinyurl.com/5gt7

MM wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

The wild animals are not overweight because they are fed by GOD, Who
feeds them the right amount.

Hmmmm ..... so a man eating tiger ..... God is feeding the man to the tiger.

Incorrect.

For a man eating tiger, it is the man eating tiger and not GOD feeding
man tiger.

The onus remains on the man to eat the right amount daily of what GOD
provides (tiger in this case).

Truth is simple :-)

May GOD soften your heart, Morton, so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:

http://T3WiJ.com

Amen.

Love in the truth,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
http://WDJW.net

On Mon, 4 May 2009 03:45:21 -0500, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
(in article
):

For a man eating tiger, it is the man eating tiger and not GOD feeding
man tiger.

A man eating tiger is a tiger eating a man so therefore God is feeding man to
the tiger.

On Mon, 4 May 2009 01:05:31 -0500, MU wrote
(in article ):

On Mon, 4 May 2009 00:00:21 -0500, MM wrote:

It is just another way of reducing the amount of food someone eats as a way
to lose weight. Whether weighing or counting calories or smaller portions
or
using point systems like in some diets, they are all the same. If one
works
for you, stick to it. The problem with diets, and that includes all of
them,
including the 2P, counting calories, smaller portions or points, is that
people do not stick to them so they gain the weight back.

duh


Nothing NU from MU. Just more of the usual MU stuff ..... MU is getting to
be like Chung ..... does Chung have a twin?

MM wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

For a man eating tiger, it is the man eating tiger and not GOD feeding
man tiger.

A man eating tiger is a tiger eating a man so therefore God is feeding man to
the tiger.

A man-eating tiger happens upon an atheist and is about to eat him,
when the atheist got on his knees begging GOD to spare his life.

GOD: "Too late."

Atheist: "Ok, then how about converting the tiger into a Christian."

GOD: "Done."

Christian tiger: "Thank you, GOD, for providing this food and for
making me wonderfully hungrier so that I will enjoy this food. Please
bless the food and please bless me thereby making me even healthier
and hungrier in Jesus' name. Amen."

After Christian tiger eats the right amount per GOD's design of his
body so that his needs have been met, he starts feeling much hungrier
(stronger) thereupon realizing he had received all he needed though
he wanted much more. Upon this signal from GOD, the Christian tiger
stops eating so that others of his pride can eat the amount they each
needed:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Proverb

May GOD soften your heart, Morton, so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:

http://T3WiJ.com

Amen.

Love in the truth,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
http://EmoryCardiology.com