|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 5th, 2005, 03:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Huh, my scale is not accurate, or theirs isn't but still on bottom anyhow
Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free.
-- Lesanne 365/163.2/164 
|
|
#2
February 5th, 2005, 03:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Free and on the bottom is good! Congrats!
-- Brenda 209/195/155 "Lesanne" wrote in message ... Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free. -- Lesanne 365/163.2/164
|
|
#3
February 5th, 2005, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good job being under goal and on the bottom.
Are you weighing yourself with the same clothes as your WW WI or are you neekid? Try weighing in with the same clothes to see what the difference is. My neekid WI matches the WW WI within the 1/2 pound rounding limits. But I had to track it for several weeks before I was comfortable saying that they were close enough. I also wear the same/similar outfit each week to eliminate any extra variables in the equation. "Lesanne" wrote in message ... Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free. -- Lesanne 365/163.2/164
|
|
#4
February 5th, 2005, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mine is the same way. My naked weight at home is the same as my clothed
weight on the WW scales. Debbie "Laura" wrote in message ... Good job being under goal and on the bottom. Are you weighing yourself with the same clothes as your WW WI or are you neekid? Try weighing in with the same clothes to see what the difference is. My neekid WI matches the WW WI within the 1/2 pound rounding limits. But I had to track it for several weeks before I was comfortable saying that they were close enough. I also wear the same/similar outfit each week to eliminate any extra variables in the equation. "Lesanne" wrote in message ... Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free. -- Lesanne 365/163.2/164
|
|
#5
February 5th, 2005, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:42:59 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote: Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free. Free is good. Why aren't your posts wrapping? Lynne Highest Weight - 308 WW Start Weight this time around Dec 29/04 - 222.4 Weight this week - 216.6 Goal - 150 (Subject to change) "Change doesn't happen while you're sitting around
|
|
#6
February 6th, 2005, 12:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
yeah you guys, same plus a half pound, usually. Today, no some freak thing.
-- Lesanne "Deb in Northern California" wrote in message ... Mine is the same way. My naked weight at home is the same as my clothed weight on the WW scales. Debbie "Laura" wrote in message ... Good job being under goal and on the bottom. Are you weighing yourself with the same clothes as your WW WI or are you neekid? Try weighing in with the same clothes to see what the difference is. My neekid WI matches the WW WI within the 1/2 pound rounding limits. But I had to track it for several weeks before I was comfortable saying that they were close enough. I also wear the same/similar outfit each week to eliminate any extra variables in the equation. "Lesanne" wrote in message ... Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free. -- Lesanne 365/163.2/164
|
|
#7
February 6th, 2005, 12:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Got me, it wraps here
 -- Lesanne "Lynne" wrote in message ... On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:42:59 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free. Free is good. Why aren't your posts wrapping? Lynne Highest Weight - 308 WW Start Weight this time around Dec 29/04 - 222.4 Weight this week - 216.6 Goal - 150 (Subject to change) "Change doesn't happen while you're sitting around
|
|
#8
February 6th, 2005, 01:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Then *maybe* there was something wrong with their scale. I would avoid that
one next week. "Lesanne" wrote in message ... yeah you guys, same plus a half pound, usually. Today, no some freak thing. -- Lesanne "Deb in Northern California" wrote in message ... Mine is the same way. My naked weight at home is the same as my clothed weight on the WW scales. Debbie "Laura" wrote in message ... Good job being under goal and on the bottom. Are you weighing yourself with the same clothes as your WW WI or are you neekid? Try weighing in with the same clothes to see what the difference is. My neekid WI matches the WW WI within the 1/2 pound rounding limits. But I had to track it for several weeks before I was comfortable saying that they were close enough. I also wear the same/similar outfit each week to eliminate any extra variables in the equation. "Lesanne" wrote in message ... Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free. -- Lesanne 365/163.2/164
|
|
#9
February 6th, 2005, 01:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
LOL!
"Fred" wrote in message ... Because her posts are big and wide as opposed to her bottom. (gd&r) On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:03:39 -0500, Lynne wrote: On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:42:59 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free. Free is good. Why aren't your posts wrapping? Lynne Highest Weight - 308 WW Start Weight this time around Dec 29/04 - 222.4 Weight this week - 216.6 Goal - 150 (Subject to change) "Change doesn't happen while you're sitting around
|
|
#10
February 6th, 2005, 01:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
oh ha
-- LESLIE ARNIM "Fred" wrote in message ... Because her posts are big and wide as opposed to her bottom. (gd&r) On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:03:39 -0500, Lynne wrote: On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:42:59 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: Well The Scale at home this morning said 160, so I am all tickled thinking this is going to be a new low official since theirs usually is a half pound more than mine. Think again. At least I am still on bottom, and free. Free is good. Why aren't your posts wrapping? Lynne Highest Weight - 308 WW Start Weight this time around Dec 29/04 - 222.4 Weight this week - 216.6 Goal - 150 (Subject to change) "Change doesn't happen while you're sitting around
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| An accurate bathroom scale | John | General Discussion | 8 | April 26th, 2004 07:39 PM |
| An accurate bathroom scale | John | Low Fat Diets | 6 | April 26th, 2004 07:39 PM |
| An accurate bathroom scale | John | Low Calorie | 6 | April 26th, 2004 07:39 PM |
| Move the scale, lose 3 pounds, I did! | Perple Gyrl | General Discussion | 7 | December 14th, 2003 12:29 AM |
| My Taylor digital scale | Carol Frilegh | General Discussion | 8 | October 22nd, 2003 03:17 AM |
Linear Mode
